paper

The formation and assembly history of the Milky Way revealed by its globular cluster population

arXiv:1806.05680 · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1609

Abstract

We use the age-metallicity distribution of 96 Galactic globular clusters (GCs) to infer the formation and assembly history of the Milky Way (MW), culminating in the reconstruction of its merger tree. Based on a quantitative comparison of the Galactic GC population to the 25 cosmological zoom-in simulations of MW-mass galaxies in the E-MOSAICS project, which self-consistently model the formation and evolution of GC populations in a cosmological context, we find that the MW assembled quickly for its mass, reaching of its present-day halo mass already at and half of its present-day stellar mass at . We reconstruct the MW's merger tree from its GC age-metallicity distribution, inferring the number of mergers as a function of mass ratio and redshift. These statistics place the MW's assembly among the 72th-94th percentile of the E-MOSAICS galaxies, whereas its properties (e.g. number of mergers, halo concentration) match the median of the simulations. We conclude that the MW has experienced no major mergers (mass ratios 1:4) since , sharpening previous limits of . We identify three massive satellite progenitors and constrain their mass growth and enrichment histories. Two are proposed to correspond to Sagittarius (few ) and the GCs formerly associated with Canis Major (). The third satellite has no known associated relic and was likely accreted between -. We name this enigmatic galaxy and propose that it is the most massive satellite () ever accreted by the MW. We predict that of the Galactic GCs formed ex-situ (in galaxies with masses -), with being former nuclear clusters.

24 pages (including appendices), 6 figures, 5 tables; accepted by MNRAS (June 12, 2018), originally submitted on March 25, 2018; Figures 4 and 6 show the main results of the paper. Updated with published version, clarifying the intended historical use of "Canis Major" as referring to a group of GCs rather than a galaxy

References in corpus (48)

Cited by in corpus (258)