My discussions of quantum foundations with John Stewart Bell
arXiv:2210.16837 · doi:10.1007/s10699-024-09946-z
Abstract
In 1976, I met John Bell several times in CERN and we talked about a possible violation of optical theorem, purity tests, EPR paradox, Bell inequalities and their violation. I review our discussions, and explain how they were related to my earlier research. I also reproduce handwritten notes, which I gave to Bell during our first meeting and a handwritten letter he sent to me in 1982. We have never met again, but I have continued to discuss BI-CHSH inequalities and their violation in several papers. The research stimulated by Bell papers and experiments performed to check his inequalities led to several important applications of quantum entanglement in quantum information and quantum technologies. Unfortunately, it led also to extraordinary metaphysical claims and speculations about quantum nonlocality and retro-causality, which in our opinion John Bell would not endorse today. BI-CHSH inequalities are violated in physics and in cognitive science, but it neither proved the completeness of quantum mechanics nor its nonlocality. Quantum computing advantage is not due to some magical instantaneous influences between distant physical systems. Therefore one has to be cautious in drawing far-reaching philosophical conclusions from Bell inequalities.
15 pages + 123 references, We changed the title and the abstract, corrected several misprints, rephrased and added some paragraphs
References in corpus (19)
- Experimental device-independent quantum key distribution between distant users
- Cosmic Bell Test: Measurement Settings from Milky Way Stars
- Quantum non-locality - It ain't necessarily so...
- Making Sense of Bell's Theorem and Quantum Nonlocality
- Event-based computer simulation model of Aspect-type experiments strictly satisfying Einstein's locality conditions
- Event-by-event simulation of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiments
- Local Realism, Contextualism and Loopholes in Bell`s Experiments
- Bell's theorem allows local theories of quantum mechanics
- Supermeasured: Violating Bell-Statistical Independence without violating physical statistical independence
- Is Einsteinian no-signalling violated in Bell Tests?
- Contextuality-by-Default description of Bell tests: Contextuality as the rule not as an exception
- Contextuality or nonlocality; what would John Bell choose today?
- Seventy Years of the EPR Paradox
- Quantum Nonlocality: how does Nature do it?
- Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiments: a discrete data driven approach
- Assumption-free derivation of the Bell-type criteria of contextuality/nonlocality
- Comment on Causal Networks and Freedom of Choice in Bell's Theorem
- Contextual Observables and Quantum Information
- A comment on: the violations of locality and free choice are equivalent resources in Bell experiments