Breakdown of statistical inference from some random experiments
arXiv:1410.7424 · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.11.010
Abstract
Many experiments can be interpreted in terms of random processes operating according to some internal protocols. When experiments are costly or cannot be repeated only one or a few finite samples are available. In this paper we study data generated by pseudo-random computer experiments operating according to particular internal protocols. We show that the standard statistical analysis performed on a sample, containing 100000 data points or more, may sometimes be highly misleading and statistical errors largely underestimated. Our results confirm in a dramatic way the dangers of standard asymptotic statistical inference if a sample is not homogenous. We demonstrate that analyzing various subdivisions of samples by multiple chi-square tests and chi-square frequency graphs is very effective in detecting sample inhomogeneity. Therefore to assure correctness of the statistical inference the above mentioned chi-square tests and other non-parametric sample homogeneity tests should be incorporated in any statistical analysis of experimental data. If such tests are not performed the reported conclusions and estimates of the errors cannot be trusted.
Accepted for publication in Computer Physics Communications
References in corpus (3)
Cited by in corpus (10)
- Is the Moon there if nobody looks: Bell Inequalities and Physical Reality
- Can we close the Bohr-Einstein quantum debate?
- EPR Paradox, Quantum Nonlocality and Physical Reality
- Contextuality-by-Default description of Bell tests: Contextuality as the rule not as an exception
- Is Einsteinian no-signalling violated in Bell Tests?
- Quantum Mechanics and modelling of physical reality
- Quantum Nonlocality: how does Nature do it?
- My discussions of quantum foundations with John Stewart Bell
- Statistical Contextual Explanation of Quantum Paradoxes
- What do we learn from computer simulations of Bell experiments?