Hidden assumptions in the derivation of the Theorem of Bell
arXiv:1108.3583 · doi:10.1088/0031-8949/2012/T151/014002
Abstract
John Bell's inequalities have already been considered by Boole in 1862. Boole established a one-to-one correspondence between experimental outcomes and mathematical abstractions of his probability theory. His abstractions are two-valued functions that permit the logical operations AND, OR and NOT and are the elements of an algebra. Violation of the inequalities indicated to Boole an inconsistency of definition of the abstractions and/or the necessity to revise the algebra. It is demonstrated in this paper, that a violation of Bell's inequality by Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen type of experiments can be explained by Boole's ideas. Violations of Bell's inequality also call for a revision of the mathematical abstractions and corresponding algebra. It will be shown that this particular view of Bell's inequalities points toward an incompleteness of quantum mechanics, rather than to any superluminal propagation or influences at a distance.
References in corpus (2)
Cited by in corpus (13)
- Is the Moon there if nobody looks: Bell Inequalities and Physical Reality
- Event-based simulation of quantum physics experiments
- Bell Inequalities, Experimental Protocols and Contextuality
- Can we close the Bohr-Einstein quantum debate?
- The contextuality loophole is fatal for Bell inequalities: Reply to a comment by I. Schmelzer
- EPR Paradox, Quantum Nonlocality and Physical Reality
- Contextuality-by-Default description of Bell tests: Contextuality as the rule not as an exception
- Is Einsteinian no-signalling violated in Bell Tests?
- Contextuality or nonlocality; what would John Bell choose today?
- Quantum Mechanics and modelling of physical reality
- My discussions of quantum foundations with John Stewart Bell
- Quantum one-way permutation over the finite field of two elements
- Unconditional quantum correlations do not violate Bell's inequality