CHSH inequality: Quantum probabilities as classical conditional probabilities
arXiv:1406.4886 · doi:10.1007/s10701-014-9851-8
Abstract
The celebrating theorem of A. Fine implies that the CHSH inequality is violated if and only if the joint probability distribution for the quadruples of observables involved the EPR-Bohm-Bell experiment does not exist, i.e., it is impossible to use the classical probabilistic model (Kolmogorov, 1933). In this note we demonstrate that, in spite of Fine's theorem, the results of observations in the EPR-Bohm-Bell experiment can be described in the classical probabilistic framework. However, the "quantum probabilities" have to be interpreted as conditional probabilities, where conditioning is with respect to fixed experimental settings. Our approach is based on the complete account of randomness involved in the experiment. The crucial point is that randomness of selections of experimental settings has to be taken into account. This approach can be applied to any complex experiment in which statistical data are collected for various (in general incompatible) experimental settings. Finally, we emphasize that our construction of the classical probability space for the EPR-Bohm-Bell experiment cannot be used to support the hidden variable approach to the quantum phenomena. The classical random parameter involved in our considerations cannot be identified with the hidden variable which is used the Bell-type considerations.
presented at the conference Quantum Theory: from Problems to Applications, Vaxjo, Sweden, June 2014, and during the course of lectures on inter-relation between classical and quantum randomness given at Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information of Austrian Academy of Science, May 2014
References in corpus (10)
- Information Invariance and Quantum Probabilities
- Violation of contextual generalization of the Leggett-Garg inequality for recognition of ambiguous figures
- Event-based computer simulation model of Aspect-type experiments strictly satisfying Einstein's locality conditions
- Quantum theory: Reconsideration of foundations
- Embedding Quantum into Classical: Contextualization vs Conditionalization
- On the equivalence of Clauser-Horne and Eberhard inequality based tests
- On the Completeness of Quantum Mechanics
- Causality and local determinism versus quantum nonlocality
- Photon flux and distance from the source: consequences for quantum foundations and technologies
- Exclusion of Time in Mermin's Proof of Bell-Type Inequalities
Cited by in corpus (32)
- Bohm-Bell type experiments: Classical probability approach to (no-)signaling and applications to quantum physics and psychology
- Modeling combination of question order effect, response replicability effect, and QQ-equality with quantum instruments
- Is the Moon there if nobody looks: Bell Inequalities and Physical Reality
- Two faced Janus of quantum nonlocality
- Bell Inequalities, Experimental Protocols and Contextuality
- Can we close the Bohr-Einstein quantum debate?
- EPR Paradox, Quantum Nonlocality and Physical Reality
- Understanding quantum mechanics: a review and synthesis in precise language
- Contextuality Analysis of the Double Slit Experiment (With a Glimpse Into Three Slits)
- Is Einsteinian no-signalling violated in Bell Tests?
- Contextuality-by-Default description of Bell tests: Contextuality as the rule not as an exception
- After Bell
- Contextuality or nonlocality; what would John Bell choose today?
- Conditional probability framework for entanglement and its decoupling from tensor product structure
- Irrelevance of Bell's Theorem for experiments involving correlations in space and time: a specific loophole-free computer-example
- Quantum postulate vs. quantum nonlocality: Is Devil in h?
- Towards experiments to test violation of the original Bell inequality
- Entanglement of observables: Quantum conditional probability approach
- Nonclassical joint distributions and Bell measurements
- A loophole of all `loophole-free' Bell-type theorems
- My discussions of quantum foundations with John Stewart Bell
- Inequalities for complementarity in observed statistics
- Single-measurement Bell analysis
- Unconditional quantum correlations do not violate Bell's inequality
- On Universality of Classical Probability with Contextually Labeled Random Variables
- Quantum conditional probabilities
- Violation of Bell quantum probability inequalities with classical fields
- Kolmogorovian versus non-Kolmogorovian probabilities in contextual theories
- Comments on New Ontology of Quantum Mechanics called CSM
- Violation of Bell Inequalities: Mapping the Conceptual Implications
- Hidden variables, free choice, context-independence, and all that
- On Universality of Classical Probability with Contextually Labeled Random Variables: Response to A. Khrennikov