Irrelevance of Bell's Theorem for experiments involving correlations in space and time: a specific loophole-free computer-example

Abstract

John Bell is generally credited to have accomplished the remarkable "proof" that any theory of physics, which is both Einstein-local and "realistic" (counterfactually definite), results in a strong upper bound to the correlations that are measured in space and time. He thus predicts that Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiments cannot violate Bell- type inequalities. We present a counterexample to this claim, based on discrete-event computer simulations. Our model-results fully agree with the predictions of quantum theory for Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiments and are free of the detection- or a coincidence-loophole.

References in corpus (2)

• Event-by-event simulation of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiments
• Counterfactual Definiteness and Bell's Inequality

Cited by in corpus (8)

• Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiments: a discrete data driven approach
• Discrete-event simulation of an extended Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiment
• Counterfactual Definiteness and Bell's Inequality
• Quantum one-way permutation over the finite field of two elements
• Classical, quantum and event-by-event simulation of a Stern-Gerlach experiment with neutrons
• Discrete-event simulation of quantum walks
• What do we learn from computer simulations of Bell experiments?
• The photon identification loophole in EPRB experiments: computer models with single-wing selection