Violation of Bell Inequalities: Mapping the Conceptual Implications
arXiv:2106.14767
Abstract
This short article concentrates on the conceptual aspects of the violation of Bell inequalities, and acts as a map to the 265 cited references. The article outlines (a) relevant characteristics of quantum mechanics, such as statistical balance and entanglement, (b) the thinking that led to the derivation of the original Bell inequality, and (c) the range of claimed implications, including realism, locality and others which attract less attention. The main conclusion is that violation of Bell inequalities appears to have some implications for the nature of physical reality, but that none of these are definite. The violations constrain possible prequantum (underlying) theories, but do not rule out the possibility that such theories might reconcile at least one understanding of locality and realism to quantum mechanical predictions. Violation might reflect, at least partly, failure to acknowledge the contextuality of quantum mechanics, or that data from different probability spaces have been inappropriately combined. Many claims that there are definite implications reflect one or more of (i) imprecise non-mathematical language, (ii) assumptions inappropriate in quantum mechanics, (iii) inadequate treatment of measurement statistics and (iv) underlying philosophical assumptions.
32 Pages (of which 17 are the reference listing), originally published under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License at https://ijqf.org/archives/6311
References in corpus (20)
- Steering, Entanglement, Nonlocality, and the EPR Paradox
- Experimental criteria for steering and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox
- Entanglement, EPR-correlations, Bell-nonlocality, and Steering
- Making Sense of Bell's Theorem and Quantum Nonlocality
- Superdeterminism: A Guide for the Perplexed
- Bell's theorem and the issue of determinism and indeterminism
- Understanding quantum mechanics: a review and synthesis in precise language
- Hardy's paradox as a demonstration of quantum irrealism
- Can many-valued logic help to comprehend quantum phenomena?
- Quantum Reality, Perspectivalism and Covariance
- Discrete-event simulation of an extended Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiment
- The Ontology Conservation Law as an Alternative to the Many World Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
- The logic of contextuality
- What Maudlin replied to
- About a "contextuality loophole" in Bell's theorem claimed to exist by Nieuwenhuizen
- John Stuart Bell: recollections of a great scientist and a great man
- Response to Comment on "A Loophole of All "Loophole-Free" Bell-Type Theorems", by J.P. Lambare
- Why Are We Obsessed with "Understanding" Quantum Mechanics?
- Response to Comment by Myrvold and Appleby
- Free Will and Quantum Mechanics: Much Ado about Nothing