$\psi$-epistemic interpretations of quantum theory have a measurement problem

Abstract

$\psi$-epistemic interpretations of quantum theory maintain that quantum states only represent incomplete information about the physical states of the world. A major motivation for this view is the promise to provide a reasonable account of state update under measurement by asserting that it is simply a natural feature of updating incomplete statistical information. Here we demonstrate that all known epistemic ontological models of quantum theory in dimension $d\ge 3$, including those designed to evade the conclusion of the PBR theorem, cannot represent state update correctly. Conversely, interpretations for which the wavefunction is real evade such restrictions despite remaining subject to long-standing criticism regarding physical discontinuity, indeterminism and the ambiguity of the Heisenberg cut. This revives the possibility of a no-go theorem with no additional assumptions, and demonstrates that what is usually thought of as a strength of epistemic interpretations may in fact be a weakness.

arXiv comment12 pages + appendices, 3 figures; added Appendix A

References in corpus (35)

• Relational Quantum Mechanics
• Models of Wave-function Collapse, Underlying Theories, and Experimental Tests
• On the reality of the quantum state
• In defense of the epistemic view of quantum states: a toy theory
• Contextuality for preparations, transformations, and unsharp measurements
• The Resource Theory of Stabilizer Computation
• An Introduction to QBism with an Application to the Locality of Quantum Mechanics
• Leggett-Garg Inequalities
• Einstein, incompleteness, and the epistemic view of quantum states
• Quantum Mechanics as Quantum Information (and only a little more)
• Hudson's Theorem for finite-dimensional quantum systems
• Is the quantum state real? An extended review of $\psi$-ontology theorems
• Quasi-probability representations of quantum theory with applications to quantum information science
• An Introduction to Quantum Error Correction and Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation
• Are quantum states real?
• Distinct Quantum States Can Be Compatible with a Single State of Reality
• Is a time symmetric interpretation of quantum theory possible without retrocausality?
• Interpretations of quantum theory: A map of madness
• A system's wave function is uniquely determined by its underlying physical state
• Non-negative Wigner functions in prime dimensions
• Psi-Epistemic Theories: The Role of Symmetry
• Computational Mechanics of Input-Output Processes: Structured transformations and the $\epsilon$-transducer
• Collapse Models
• Nonnegative subtheories and quasiprobability representations of qubits
• Ontological models and the interpretation of contextuality
• Dynamics of a qubit as a classical stochastic process with time-correlated noise: minimal measurement invasiveness
• Reality of the quantum state: Towards a stronger ψ-ontology theorem
• Representing probabilistic data via ontological models
• Contextuality bounds the efficiency of classical simulation of quantum processes
• The whole is greater than the sum of the parts: on the possibility of purely statistical interpretations of quantum theory
• Ontological Models for Quantum Mechanics and the Kochen-Specker theorem
• Spekkens' toy model in all dimensions and its relationship with stabilizer quantum mechanics
• Why Bohr was (Mostly) Right
• Quantum Chaos and Quantum-Classical Correspondence
• A Contextual $\psi$-Epistemic Model of the $n$-Qubit Stabilizer Formalism

Cited by in corpus (6)

• Phase space simulation method for quantum computation with magic states on qubits
• Could wavefunctions simultaneously represent knowledge and reality?
• Quantum Reconstructions as Stepping Stones toward Psi-Doxastic Interpretations?
• What does it take to solve the measurement problem?
• Violation of Bell Inequalities: Mapping the Conceptual Implications
• Quantum Mechanics: Statistical Balance Prompts Caution in Assessing Conceptual Implications