Psi-Epistemic Theories: The Role of Symmetry
arXiv:1303.2834 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.88.032111
Abstract
Formalizing an old desire of Einstein, "psi-epistemic theories" try to reproduce the predictions of quantum mechanics, while viewing quantum states as ordinary probability distributions over underlying objects called "ontic states." Regardless of one's philosophical views about such theories, the question arises of whether one can cleanly rule them out, by proving no-go theorems analogous to the Bell Inequality. In the 1960s, Kochen and Specker (who first studied these theories) constructed an elegant psi-epistemic theory for Hilbert space dimension d=2, but also showed that any deterministic psi-epistemic theory must be "measurement contextual" in dimensions 3 and higher. Last year, the topic attracted renewed attention, when Pusey, Barrett, and Rudolph (PBR) showed that any psi-epistemic theory must "behave badly under tensor product." In this paper, we prove that even without the Kochen-Specker or PBR assumptions, there are no psi-epistemic theories in dimensions d>=3 that satisfy two reasonable conditions: (1) symmetry under unitary transformations, and (2) "maximum nontriviality" (meaning that the probability distributions corresponding to any two non-orthogonal states overlap). This no-go theorem holds if the ontic space is either the set of quantum states or the set of unitaries. The proof of this result, in the general case, uses some measure theory and differential geometry. On the other hand, we also show the surprising result that without the symmetry restriction, one can construct maximally-nontrivial psi-epistemic theories in every finite dimension d.
20 pages, 3 figures, added generalization of no-go theorem to handle ontic state space U(d)
References in corpus (6)
- Are quantum states real?
- Maximally epistemic interpretations of the quantum state and contextuality
- No-go theorems for ψ-epistemic models based on a continuity assumption
- Ontological models and the interpretation of contextuality
- How statistical are quantum states?
- Ontological Models for Quantum Mechanics and the Kochen-Specker theorem
Cited by in corpus (40)
- Is the quantum state real? An extended review of -ontology theorems
- Measurements on the reality of the wavefunction
- No -epistemic model can fully explain the indistinguishability of quantum states
- Is a time symmetric interpretation of quantum theory possible without retrocausality?
- A system's wave function is uniquely determined by its underlying physical state
- How ψ-epistemic models fail at explaining the indistinguishability of quantum states
- Quantum Theory and Determinism
- Can different quantum state vectors correspond to the same physical state? An experimental test
- A measure of physical reality
- -epistemic models are exponentially bad at explaining the distinguishability of quantum states
- No Return to Classical Reality
- Information-reality complementarity: The role of measurements and quantum reference frames
- Quantum epistemology from subquantum ontology: quantum mechanics from theory of classical random fields
- A Quantum Paradox of Choice: More Freedom Makes Summoning a Quantum State Harder
- Reality of the quantum state: Towards a stronger ψ-ontology theorem
- Discord of response
- Noncontextuality Inequalities from Antidistinguishability
- Quantifying continuous-variable realism
- Ontological models, preparation contextuality and nonlocality
- A cold-atoms based processor for deterministic quantum computation with one qubit in intractably large Hilbert spaces
- On the reality of the quantum state once again: A no-go theorem for -ontic models
- -epistemic interpretations of quantum theory have a measurement problem
- Ontological Models in Quantum Mechanics: What do they tell us?
- How Real are Quantum States in -ontic Models?
- A -Ontology Result without the Cartesian Product Assumption
- Towards optimal experimental tests on the reality of the quantum state
- An argument for psi-ontology in terms of protective measurements
- Why protective measurement does not establish the reality of the quantum state
- Emergent Quantum Mechanics at the Boundary of a Local Classical Lattice Model
- Protective Measurements and the Reality of the Wave Function
- Ontological models for quantum theory as functors
- Not-Post-Peierls compatibility under noisy channels
- Reciprocal ontological models show indeterminism of the order of quantum theory
- Fleeting Critical Review of the Recent Ontic Breakthrough in Quantum Mechanics
- Reality, Causality, and Quantum Theory
- Bell Nonlocality and the Reality of Quantum Wavefunction
- An operational notion of classicality based on physical principles
- Failure of epistemic models to explain the antidistinguishability of quantum mixed preparations
- From Joint to Single-System Psi-Onticity Without Preparation Independence
- Limits of Absoluteness of Observed Events in Timelike Scenarios: A No-Go Theorem