On the reality of the quantum state once again: A no-go theorem for -ontic models
arXiv:2201.11842 · doi:10.1007/s10701-023-00748-0
Abstract
In this paper we show that -ontic models, as defined by Harrigan and Spekkens (HS), cannot reproduce quantum theory. Instead of focusing on probability, we use information theoretic considerations to show that all pure states of -ontic models must be orthogonal to each other, in clear violation of quantum mechanics. Given that (i) Pusey, Barrett and Rudolph (PBR) previously showed that -epistemic models, as defined by HS, also contradict quantum mechanics, and (ii) the HS categorization is exhausted by these two types of models, we conclude that the HS categorization itself is problematic as it leaves no space for models that can reproduce quantum theory.
arXiv comment6 pages + 1 page mathematical appendix, 2 figures. Accepted by Foundations of Physics
References in corpus (26)
- On the reality of the quantum state
- Einstein, incompleteness, and the epistemic view of quantum states
- The lesson of causal discovery algorithms for quantum correlations: Causal explanations of Bell-inequality violations require fine-tuning
- Is the quantum state real? An extended review of -ontology theorems
- Is a system's wave function in one-to-one correspondence with its elements of reality?
- An experimental test of noncontextuality without unwarranted idealizations
- Are quantum states real?
- Distinct Quantum States Can Be Compatible with a Single State of Reality
- Reconstruction of Gaussian quantum mechanics from Liouville mechanics with an epistemic restriction
- Measurements on the reality of the wavefunction
- No -epistemic model can fully explain the indistinguishability of quantum states
- Is a time symmetric interpretation of quantum theory possible without retrocausality?
- Implications of the Pusey-Barrett-Rudolph quantum no-go theorem
- Maximally epistemic interpretations of the quantum state and contextuality
- A system's wave function is uniquely determined by its underlying physical state
- How ψ-epistemic models fail at explaining the indistinguishability of quantum states
- -epistemic models are exponentially bad at explaining the distinguishability of quantum states
- Psi-Epistemic Theories: The Role of Symmetry
- No-go theorems for ψ-epistemic models based on a continuity assumption
- No-go theorem for the composition of quantum systems
- Could wavefunctions simultaneously represent knowledge and reality?
- Variability as a better characterization of Shannon entropy
- Reality of the quantum state: Towards a stronger ψ-ontology theorem
- How Real are Quantum States in -ontic Models?
- Relational Quantum Mechanics and the PBR Theorem: A Peaceful Coexistence
- Does the PBR Theorem Rule Out a Statistical Understanding of Quantum Mechanics?