Reality of the quantum state: Towards a stronger ψ-ontology theorem

Abstract

The Pusey-Barrett-Rudolph (PBR) no-go theorem provides an argument for the reality of the quantum state by ruling out ψ-epistemic ontological theories, in which the quantum state is of a statistical nature. It applies under an assumption of preparation independence, the validity of which has been subject to debate. We propose two plausible and less restrictive alternatives: a weaker notion allowing for classical correlations, and an even weaker, physically motivated notion of independence, which merely prohibits the possibility of superluminal causal influences in the preparation process. The latter is a minimal requirement for enabling a reasonable treatment of subsystems in any theory. It is demonstrated by means of an explicit ψ-epistemic ontological model that the argument of PBR becomes invalid under the alternative notions of independence. As an intermediate step, we recover a result which is valid in the presence of classical correlations. Finally, we obtain a theorem which holds under the minimal requirement, approximating the result of PBR. For this, we consider experiments involving randomly sampled preparations and derive bounds on the degree of ψ epistemicity that is consistent with the quantum-mechanical predictions. The approximation is exact in the limit as the sample space of preparations becomes infinite.

rewordings and typos edited to agree with published version

References in corpus (9)

• Is the quantum state real? An extended review of $\psi$-ontology theorems
• QBism and the Greeks: why a quantum state does not represent an element of physical reality
• How ψ-epistemic models fail at explaining the indistinguishability of quantum states
• Finite de Finetti theorem for conditional probability distributions describing physical theories
• The compositional structure of multipartite quantum entanglement
• Communication complexity and the reality of the wave-function
• Quantum Superpositions Cannot be Epistemic
• Reflections on the PBR Theorem: Reality Criteria & Preparation Independence
• Pre-entaglement shows that individual quantum systems do not possess states

Cited by in corpus (15)

• Strong Quantum Nonlocality without Entanglement
• Is a time symmetric interpretation of quantum theory possible without retrocausality?
• No Return to Classical Reality
• Quantum Advantage from Sequential-Transformation Contextuality
• Understanding quantum mechanics: a review and synthesis in precise language
• $\psi$-epistemic interpretations of quantum theory have a measurement problem
• On the reality of the quantum state once again: A no-go theorem for $\psi$-ontic models
• How Real are Quantum States in $\psi$-ontic Models?
• A $\psi$-Ontology Result without the Cartesian Product Assumption
• Relational Quantum Mechanics and the PBR Theorem: A Peaceful Coexistence
• Does the PBR Theorem Rule Out a Statistical Understanding of Quantum Mechanics?
• Not-Post-Peierls compatibility under noisy channels
• Reality, Causality, and Quantum Theory
• The Interplay between Quantum Contextuality and Wigner Negativity
• Quantum Entanglement in Time