How ψ-epistemic models fail at explaining the indistinguishability of quantum states

Abstract

We study the extent to which ψ-epistemic models for quantum measurement statistics---models where the quantum state does not have a real, ontic status---can explain the indistinguishability of nonorthogonal quantum states. This is done by comparing the overlap of any two quantum states with the overlap of the corresponding classical probability distributions over ontic states in a ψ-epistemic model. It is shown that in Hilbert spaces of dimension $d\ge 4$, the ratio between the classical and quantum overlaps in any ψ-epistemic model must be arbitrarily small for certain nonorthogonal states, suggesting that such models are arbitrarily bad at explaining the indistinguishability of quantum states. For dimensions $d$ = 3 and 4, we construct explicit states and measurements that can be used experimentally to put stringent bounds on the ratio of classical-to-quantum overlaps in ψ-epistemic models, allowing one in particular to rule out maximally ψ-epistemic models more efficiently than previously proposed.

arXiv comment8 pages

References in corpus (15)

• On the reality of the quantum state
• In defense of the epistemic view of quantum states: a toy theory
• Einstein, incompleteness, and the epistemic view of quantum states
• Is a system's wave function in one-to-one correspondence with its elements of reality?
• Are quantum states real?
• Distinct Quantum States Can Be Compatible with a Single State of Reality
• No $\psi$-epistemic model can fully explain the indistinguishability of quantum states
• Conditions for compatibility of quantum state assignments
• Implications of the Pusey-Barrett-Rudolph quantum no-go theorem
• Maximally epistemic interpretations of the quantum state and contextuality
• $\psi$-epistemic models are exponentially bad at explaining the distinguishability of quantum states
• Psi-Epistemic Theories: The Role of Symmetry
• No-go theorems for ψ-epistemic models based on a continuity assumption
• No-go theorem for the composition of quantum systems
• Alternative Experimental Protocol for a PBR-Like Result

Cited by in corpus (29)

• Is the quantum state real? An extended review of $\psi$-ontology theorems
• Measurements on the reality of the wavefunction
• Is a time symmetric interpretation of quantum theory possible without retrocausality?
• Experimental minimum-error quantum-state discrimination in high dimensions
• Can different quantum state vectors correspond to the same physical state? An experimental test
• A measure of physical reality
• No Return to Classical Reality
• Information-reality complementarity: The role of measurements and quantum reference frames
• The Meaning of the Wave Function: In Search of the Ontology of Quantum Mechanics
• Reality of the quantum state: Towards a stronger ψ-ontology theorem
• Realism-information complementarity in photonic weak measurements
• Discriminating mirror symmetric states with restricted contextual advantage
• Noncontextuality Inequalities from Antidistinguishability
• Quantifying continuous-variable realism
• On the reality of the quantum state once again: A no-go theorem for $\psi$-ontic models
• How Real are Quantum States in $\psi$-ontic Models?
• Towards optimal experimental tests on the reality of the quantum state
• Detection efficiency loophole in Pusey-Barrett-Rudolph theorem
• Quantum Superpositions Cannot be Epistemic
• Single-shot Distinguishability and Anti-distinguishability of Quantum Measurements
• Two definitions of maximally $\psi$-epistemic ontological model and preparation non-contextuality
• Not-Post-Peierls compatibility under noisy channels
• Reality, Causality, and Quantum Theory
• Limitation of maximally entangled probes for single-shot distinguishability of unitaries
• Bell Nonlocality and the Reality of Quantum Wavefunction
• Failure of epistemic models to explain the antidistinguishability of quantum mixed preparations
• Demonstration of quantum correlations that are incompatible with absoluteness of measurement
• Quantum Entanglement in Time
• Limits of Absoluteness of Observed Events in Timelike Scenarios: A No-Go Theorem