No-go theorems for ψ-epistemic models based on a continuity assumption

Abstract

The quantum state ψis a mathematical object used to determine the probabilities of different outcomes when measuring a physical system. Its fundamental nature has been the subject of discussions since the inception of quantum theory: is it ontic, that is, does it correspond to a real property of the physical system? Or is it epistemic, that is, does it merely represent our knowledge about the system? Assuming a natural continuity assumption and a weak separability assumption, we show here that epistemic interpretations of the quantum state are in contradiction with quantum theory. Our argument is different from the recent proof of Pusey, Barrett, and Rudolph and it already yields a non-trivial constraint on ψ-epistemic models using a single copy of the system in question.

Version 1 contains both theory and an illustrative experiment. Version 2 contains only the theory (the experiment with expanded discussion will be posted separatly at a later date). The main novelty of Version 2 is a detailed comparison in appendix 2 with L. Hardy arXiv:1205.14396. Version 2 is 6 pages of text and 1 figure; v3: minor changes

References in corpus (7)

• Are quantum states real?
• Implications of the Pusey-Barrett-Rudolph quantum no-go theorem
• Maximally epistemic interpretations of the quantum state and contextuality
• Exponential complexity and ontological theories of quantum mechanics
• Can different quantum state vectors correspond to the same physical state? An experimental test
• State space dimensionality in short memory hidden variable theories
• Can quantum mechanics be considered as statistical? an analysis of the PBR theorem

Cited by in corpus (30)

• Is the quantum state real? An extended review of $\psi$-ontology theorems
• Measurements on the reality of the wavefunction
• No $\psi$-epistemic model can fully explain the indistinguishability of quantum states
• How ψ-epistemic models fail at explaining the indistinguishability of quantum states
• Quantum Theory and Determinism
• A measure of physical reality
• $\psi$-epistemic models are exponentially bad at explaining the distinguishability of quantum states
• Psi-Epistemic Theories: The Role of Symmetry
• Information-reality complementarity: The role of measurements and quantum reference frames
• The New Quantum Logic
• The Meaning of the Wave Function: In Search of the Ontology of Quantum Mechanics
• Could wavefunctions simultaneously represent knowledge and reality?
• Realism-information complementarity in photonic weak measurements
• Quantifying continuous-variable realism
• Experimental refutation of a class of ψ-epistemic models
• On the reality of the quantum state once again: A no-go theorem for $\psi$-ontic models
• Towards optimal experimental tests on the reality of the quantum state
• Distinguishing initial state-vectors from each other in histories formulations and the PBR argument
• Why protective measurement does not establish the reality of the quantum state
• An argument for psi-ontology in terms of protective measurements
• Protective Measurements and the Reality of the Wave Function
• Detection efficiency loophole in Pusey-Barrett-Rudolph theorem
• Two definitions of maximally $\psi$-epistemic ontological model and preparation non-contextuality
• Quantum wavefunction reconstruction by free-electron spectral shearing interferometry
• Reciprocal ontological models show indeterminism of the order of quantum theory
• Bell Nonlocality and the Reality of Quantum Wavefunction
• Reality, Causality, and Quantum Theory
• What does it take to solve the measurement problem?
• Quantum Entanglement in Time
• Is spacetime quantum?