Are quantum states real?
arXiv:1205.1439 · doi:10.1142/S0217979213450124
Abstract
In this paper we consider theories in which reality is described by some underlying variables. Each value these variables can take represents an ontic state (a particular state of reality). The preparation of a quantum state corresponds to a distribution over the ontic states. If we make three basic assumptions, we can show that the distributions over ontic states corresponding to distinct pure states are non-overlapping. This means that we can deduce the quantum state from a knowledge of the ontic state. Hence, if these assumptions are correct, we can claim that the quantum state is a real thing (it is written into the underlying variables that describe reality). The key assumption we use in this proof is ontic indifference - that quantum transformations that do not affect a given pure quantum state can be implemented in such a way that they do not affect the ontic states in the support of that state. In fact this assumption is violated in the Spekkens toy model (which captures many aspects of quantum theory and in which different pure states of the model have overlapping distributions over ontic states). This paper proves that ontic indifference must be violated in any model reproducing quantum theory in which the quantum state is not a real thing. The argument presented in this paper is different from that given in a recent paper by Pusey, Barrett, and Rudolph. It uses a different key assumption and it pertains to a single copy of the system in question.
19 pages, 4 figures. Remarks added concerning fact that ontic indifference assumption is violated in Spekkens toy model
References in corpus (7)
- QBism, the Perimeter of Quantum Bayesianism
- Implications of the Pusey-Barrett-Rudolph quantum no-go theorem
- Exponential complexity and ontological theories of quantum mechanics
- A minimalist pilot-wave model for quantum electrodynamics
- Toy quantum categories
- State space dimensionality in short memory hidden variable theories
- Can quantum mechanics be considered as statistical? an analysis of the PBR theorem
Cited by in corpus (63)
- Is the quantum state real? An extended review of -ontology theorems
- Measurements on the reality of the wavefunction
- No -epistemic model can fully explain the indistinguishability of quantum states
- Is a time symmetric interpretation of quantum theory possible without retrocausality?
- Maximally epistemic interpretations of the quantum state and contextuality
- A system's wave function is uniquely determined by its underlying physical state
- How ψ-epistemic models fail at explaining the indistinguishability of quantum states
- Quantum Theory and Determinism
- Determining the Quantum Expectation Value by Measuring a Single Photon
- Can different quantum state vectors correspond to the same physical state? An experimental test
- -epistemic models are exponentially bad at explaining the distinguishability of quantum states
- Why interference phenomena do not capture the essence of quantum theory
- Psi-Epistemic Theories: The Role of Symmetry
- Operational quantum theory without predefined time
- Quantum Advantage from Sequential-Transformation Contextuality
- Information-reality complementarity: The role of measurements and quantum reference frames
- No-go theorems for ψ-epistemic models based on a continuity assumption
- The New Quantum Logic
- The Meaning of the Wave Function: In Search of the Ontology of Quantum Mechanics
- Antidistinguishability of Pure Quantum States
- A Quantum Paradox of Choice: More Freedom Makes Summoning a Quantum State Harder
- Could wavefunctions simultaneously represent knowledge and reality?
- Understanding quantum mechanics: a review and synthesis in precise language
- Quantum- vs. Macro- Realism: What does the Leggett-Garg Inequality actually test?
- Reality of the quantum state: Towards a stronger ψ-ontology theorem
- Quantifying continuous-variable realism
- Discreteness and Determinism in Superstrings
- All is Psi
- Experimental refutation of a class of ψ-epistemic models
- The measurement problem revisited
- Protective Measurement -- a new quantum measurement paradigm: detailed description of the first realisation
- A representation of the wave function on the three-dimensional space
- -epistemic interpretations of quantum theory have a measurement problem
- On the reality of the quantum state once again: A no-go theorem for -ontic models
- Towards optimal experimental tests on the reality of the quantum state
- The post-determined block universe
- An argument for psi-ontology in terms of protective measurements
- Why protective measurement does not establish the reality of the quantum state
- Quantum guessing games with posterior information
- Protective Measurements and the Reality of the Wave Function
- The Operational Choi-Jamiolkowski Isomorphism
- Not-Post-Peierls compatibility under noisy channels
- Fleeting Critical Review of the Recent Ontic Breakthrough in Quantum Mechanics
- Reciprocal ontological models show indeterminism of the order of quantum theory
- Two definitions of maximally -epistemic ontological model and preparation non-contextuality
- Reality, Causality, and Quantum Theory
- Is the Quantum State Real in the Hilbert Space Formulation?
- Reflections on the PBR Theorem: Reality Criteria & Preparation Independence
- Information versus Physicality: On the Nature of the Wavefunctions of Quantum Mechanics
- An alternative formalism for modeling spin
- Bell Nonlocality and the Reality of Quantum Wavefunction
- A no-go result for QBism
- Can the ontology of Bohmian mechanics consists only in particles? The PBR theorem says no
- Introducing the Q-based interpretation of quantum theory
- Conspiracy in ontological models with measurement contextuality
- A principle of information conservation for physical laws (Hidden information in quantum systems?)
- Is spacetime quantum?
- On the Nature of Reality
- Limits of Absoluteness of Observed Events in Timelike Scenarios: A No-Go Theorem
- -Epistemic Models, Einsteinian Intuitions, and No-Gos. A Critical Study of Recent Developments on the Quantum State
- Indeterminate Probabilities and the Weak Quantum Law of Large Numbers
- Do psi-ontology theorems prove that the wave function is not epistemic?
- Can category-theoretic semantics resolve the problem of the interpretation of the quantum state vector?