Two definitions of maximally $\psi$-epistemic ontological model and preparation non-contextuality

Abstract

An ontological model is termed as maximally $\psi$-epistemic if the overlap between any two quantum states is fully accounted for by the overlap of their respective probability distributions of ontic states. However, in literature, there exists the two different mathematical definitions (termed here as 1M$\psi$E and 2M$\psi$E) that capture the equivalent notion of maximal $\psi$-epistemicity. In this work, we provide three theorems to critically examine the connections between preparation non-contextuality and the aforementioned two definitions of maximal $\psi$- epistemicity. In Theorem-1, we provide a simple and direct argument of an existing proof to demonstrate that the mixed state preparation non-contextuality implies the first definition of maximal $\psi$-epistemicity. In Theorem-2, we prove that the second definition of maximal $\psi$-epistemicity implies pure-state preparation non-contextuality. If both the definitions capture the equivalent notion of maximal $\psi$-epistemicity then from the aforementioned two theorems one infers that the mixed-state preparation non-contextuality implies pure-state preparation non-contextuality. But, in Theorem-3, we demonstrate that the mixed-state preparation non-contextuality in an ontological model implies pure-state contextuality and vice-versa. This leads one to conclude that 1M$\psi$E and 2M$\psi$E capture inequivalent notion of maximal $\psi$-epistemicity. The implications of our results and their connections to other no-go theorems are discussed.

References in corpus (17)

• On the reality of the quantum state
• Contextuality for preparations, transformations, and unsharp measurements
• Einstein, incompleteness, and the epistemic view of quantum states
• Is the quantum state real? An extended review of $\psi$-ontology theorems
• Are quantum states real?
• Distinct Quantum States Can Be Compatible with a Single State of Reality
• Measurements on the reality of the wavefunction
• No $\psi$-epistemic model can fully explain the indistinguishability of quantum states
• Implications of the Pusey-Barrett-Rudolph quantum no-go theorem
• Maximally epistemic interpretations of the quantum state and contextuality
• How ψ-epistemic models fail at explaining the indistinguishability of quantum states
• The status of determinism in proofs of the impossibility of a noncontextual model of quantum theory
• $\psi$-epistemic models are exponentially bad at explaining the distinguishability of quantum states
• No-go theorems for ψ-epistemic models based on a continuity assumption
• Robust preparation noncontextuality inequalities in the simplest scenario
• Ontological models, preparation contextuality and nonlocality
• A variant of Peres-Mermin proof for testing noncontextual realist models

Cited by in corpus (3)

• Oblivious communication game, self-testing of projective and non-projective measurements and certification of randomness
• Discriminating mirror symmetric states with restricted contextual advantage
• Protective Measurement -- a new quantum measurement paradigm: detailed description of the first realisation