-epistemic models are exponentially bad at explaining the distinguishability of quantum states
arXiv:1401.7996 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.160404
Abstract
The status of the quantum state is perhaps the most controversial issue in the foundations of quantum theory. Is it an epistemic state (state of knowledge) or an ontic state (state of reality)? In realist models of quantum theory, the epistemic view asserts that nonorthogonal quantum states correspond to overlapping probability measures over the true ontic states. This naturally accounts for a large number of otherwise puzzling quantum phenomena. For example, the indistinguishability of nonorthogonal states is explained by the fact that the ontic state sometimes lies in the overlap region, in which case there is nothing in reality that could distinguish the two states. For this to work, the amount of overlap of the probability measures should be comparable to the indistinguishability of the quantum states. In this letter, I exhibit a family of states for which the ratio of these two quantities must be in Hilbert spaces of dimension that are divisible by . This implies that, for large Hilbert space dimension, the epistemic explanation of indistinguishability becomes implausible at an exponential rate as the Hilbert space dimension increases.
4 pages and 1 line, revTeX4-1. v2 Added two references, submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett. v3 Edited to match published version
References in corpus (4)
Cited by in corpus (35)
- Is the quantum state real? An extended review of -ontology theorems
- Measurements on the reality of the wavefunction
- Is a time symmetric interpretation of quantum theory possible without retrocausality?
- How ψ-epistemic models fail at explaining the indistinguishability of quantum states
- Quantum Theory and Determinism
- Experimental minimum-error quantum-state discrimination in high dimensions
- A measure of physical reality
- No Return to Classical Reality
- Information-reality complementarity: The role of measurements and quantum reference frames
- The Meaning of the Wave Function: In Search of the Ontology of Quantum Mechanics
- Reality of the quantum state: Towards a stronger ψ-ontology theorem
- Realism-information complementarity in photonic weak measurements
- Contextuality bounds the efficiency of classical simulation of quantum processes
- Noncontextuality Inequalities from Antidistinguishability
- Quantifying continuous-variable realism
- Communication complexity and the reality of the wave-function
- On the reality of the quantum state once again: A no-go theorem for -ontic models
- Ontological Models in Quantum Mechanics: What do they tell us?
- How Real are Quantum States in -ontic Models?
- Towards optimal experimental tests on the reality of the quantum state
- Detection efficiency loophole in Pusey-Barrett-Rudolph theorem
- Quantum Superpositions Cannot be Epistemic
- Not-Post-Peierls compatibility under noisy channels
- Inconsistency of a realistic interpretation of quantum measurements: A simple example
- Single-shot Distinguishability and Anti-distinguishability of Quantum Measurements
- Two definitions of maximally -epistemic ontological model and preparation non-contextuality
- Reality, Causality, and Quantum Theory
- Bell Nonlocality and the Reality of Quantum Wavefunction
- Limitation of maximally entangled probes for single-shot distinguishability of unitaries
- An operational notion of classicality based on physical principles
- Demonstration of quantum correlations that are incompatible with absoluteness of measurement
- Failure of epistemic models to explain the antidistinguishability of quantum mixed preparations
- Limits of Absoluteness of Observed Events in Timelike Scenarios: A No-Go Theorem
- Single-shot antidistinguishability of unitary operations
- Quantum Entanglement in Time