Failure of epistemic models to explain the antidistinguishability of quantum mixed preparations

Abstract

We investigate the limits of epistemic models in reproducing the empirical predictions of general quantum preparations. This involves comparing the common quantum overlap determined by the anti-distinguishability of a set of preparations with the common epistemic overlap of the probability distribution over the ontic states describing these preparations. We show that no epistemic model with non-zero common overlap can reproduce the predictions of quantum theory for mixed preparations, even for qubit systems. We explicitly provide sets of distinct mixed preparations, starting from qutrit systems, that give rise to identical quantum mixed states for which the common epistemic overlap must be zero. Finally, we demonstrate the strongest form of preparation contextuality by presenting pairs of mixed preparations that yield identical quantum mixed states while their epistemic overlap must vanish.

arXiv comment20 pages

References in corpus (38)

• On the reality of the quantum state
• In defense of the epistemic view of quantum states: a toy theory
• Contextuality for preparations, transformations, and unsharp measurements
• Einstein, incompleteness, and the epistemic view of quantum states
• Is the quantum state real? An extended review of $\psi$-ontology theorems
• Negativity and contextuality are equivalent notions of nonclassicality
• Specker's Parable of the Over-protective Seer: A Road to Contextuality, Nonlocality and Complementarity (PLUS AN ERRATUM)
• Is a system's wave function in one-to-one correspondence with its elements of reality?
• Anomalous Weak Values Are Proofs of Contextuality
• Preparation contextuality powers parity-oblivious multiplexing
• Distinct Quantum States Can Be Compatible with a Single State of Reality
• No $\psi$-epistemic model can fully explain the indistinguishability of quantum states
• Contextual advantage for state discrimination
• Quantum fluctuation theorems, contextuality and work quasi-probabilities
• Conditions for compatibility of quantum state assignments
• Maximally epistemic interpretations of the quantum state and contextuality
• How ψ-epistemic models fail at explaining the indistinguishability of quantum states
• State independent contextuality advances one-way communication
• Why interference phenomena do not capture the essence of quantum theory
• $\psi$-epistemic models are exponentially bad at explaining the distinguishability of quantum states
• Psi-Epistemic Theories: The Role of Symmetry
• Uniqueness of noncontextual models for stabilizer subtheories
• Preparation contextuality as an essential feature underlying quantum communication advantage
• Optimal quantum preparation contextuality in $n$-bit parity-oblivious multiplexing task
• Contextual advantages and certification for maximum confidence discrimination
• Robust preparation noncontextuality inequalities in the simplest scenario
• What is nonclassical about uncertainty relations?
• Characterising and bounding the set of quantum behaviours in contextuality scenarios
• Communication tasks with infinite quantum-classical separation
• Epistemic view of quantum states and communication complexity of quantum channels
• The wavefunction as a true ensemble
• Quantum prescriptions are more ontologically distinct than they are operationally distinguishable
• An invertible map between Bell non-local and contextuality scenarios
• Classical Cost of Transmitting a Qubit
• Simple Communication Complexity Separation from Quantum State Antidistinguishability
• Contextuality as a Precondition for Quantum Entanglement
• Reformulating noncontextuality inequalities in an operational approach
• Tight bounds for antidistinguishability and circulant sets of pure quantum states