No -epistemic model can fully explain the indistinguishability of quantum states
arXiv:1310.8302 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.250403
Abstract
According to a recent no-go theorem (M. Pusey, J. Barrett and T. Rudolph, Nature Physics 8, 475 (2012)), models in which quantum states correspond to probability distributions over the values of some underlying physical variables must have the following feature: the distributions corresponding to distinct quantum states do not overlap. This is significant because if the distributions do not overlap, then the quantum state itself is encoded by the physical variables. In such a model, it cannot coherently be maintained that the quantum state merely encodes information about underlying physical variables. The theorem, however, considers only models in which the physical variables corresponding to independently prepared systems are independent. This work considers models that are defined for a single quantum system of dimension , such that the independence condition does not arise. We prove a result in a similar spirit to the original no-go theorem, in the form of an upper bound on the extent to which the probability distributions can overlap, consistently with reproducing quantum predictions. In particular, models in which the quantum overlap between pure states is equal to the classical overlap between the corresponding probability distributions cannot reproduce the quantum predictions in any dimension . The result is noise tolerant, and an experiment is motivated to distinguish the class of models ruled out from quantum theory.
5+5 pages
References in corpus (3)
Cited by in corpus (52)
- Is the quantum state real? An extended review of -ontology theorems
- Measurements on the reality of the wavefunction
- Is a time symmetric interpretation of quantum theory possible without retrocausality?
- Contextual advantage for state discrimination
- How ψ-epistemic models fail at explaining the indistinguishability of quantum states
- Bell's inequality violation with spins in silicon
- A measure of physical reality
- -epistemic models are exponentially bad at explaining the distinguishability of quantum states
- No Return to Classical Reality
- Information-reality complementarity: The role of measurements and quantum reference frames
- Navigating the 16-dimensional Hilbert space of a high-spin donor qudit with electric and magnetic fields
- The view from a Wigner bubble
- The Meaning of the Wave Function: In Search of the Ontology of Quantum Mechanics
- Q-functions as models of physical reality
- A Quantum Paradox of Choice: More Freedom Makes Summoning a Quantum State Harder
- Quantum and classical bounds for two-state overlaps
- The wavefunction as a true ensemble
- Realism-information complementarity in photonic weak measurements
- Reality of the quantum state: Towards a stronger ψ-ontology theorem
- Quantum prescriptions are more ontologically distinct than they are operationally distinguishable
- Contextuality bounds the efficiency of classical simulation of quantum processes
- Discriminating mirror symmetric states with restricted contextual advantage
- A Stronger Theorem Against Macro-realism
- Noncontextuality Inequalities from Antidistinguishability
- Simple Communication Complexity Separation from Quantum State Antidistinguishability
- Quantifying continuous-variable realism
- Hyperfine spectroscopy and fast, all-optical arbitrary state initialization and readout of a single, ten-level Ge vacancy nuclear spin qudit in diamond
- On the optimal error exponents for classical and quantum antidistinguishability
- On the reality of the quantum state once again: A no-go theorem for -ontic models
- How Real are Quantum States in -ontic Models?
- Towards optimal experimental tests on the reality of the quantum state
- Constraints on Macroscopic Realism Without Assuming Non-Invasive Measurability
- The Minimal Modal Interpretation of Quantum Theory
- Detection efficiency loophole in Pusey-Barrett-Rudolph theorem
- Quantum Superpositions Cannot be Epistemic
- Completely real? A critical note on the claims by Colbeck and Renner
- Single-shot Distinguishability and Anti-distinguishability of Quantum Measurements
- Two definitions of maximally -epistemic ontological model and preparation non-contextuality
- Inconsistency of a realistic interpretation of quantum measurements: A simple example
- Not-Post-Peierls compatibility under noisy channels
- POVMs are equivalent to projections for perfect state exclusion of three pure states in three dimensions
- Reality, Causality, and Quantum Theory
- Limitation of maximally entangled probes for single-shot distinguishability of unitaries
- Bell Nonlocality and the Reality of Quantum Wavefunction
- An operational notion of classicality based on physical principles
- Failure of epistemic models to explain the antidistinguishability of quantum mixed preparations
- How contextuality and antidistinguishability are related
- Limits of Absoluteness of Observed Events in Timelike Scenarios: A No-Go Theorem
- Quantum description of reality is epistemically incomplete
- Is spacetime quantum?
- Quantum Entanglement in Time
- Single-shot antidistinguishability of unitary operations