How statistical are quantum states?
arXiv:1207.6906
Abstract
A novel no-go theorem is presented which sets a bound upon the extent to which 'Ψ-epistemic' interpretations of quantum theory are able to explain the overlap between non-orthogonal quantum states in terms of an experimenter's ignorance of an underlying state of reality. The theorem applies to any Hilbert space of dimension greater than two. In the limit of large Hilbert spaces, no more than half of the overlap between quantum states can be accounted for. Unlike other recent no-go theorems no additional assumptions, such as forms of locality, invasiveness, or non-contextuality, are required.
5 pages. Noise tolerant calculation removed in favour of better calculation in forthcoming article
Cited by in corpus (18)
- Is the quantum state real? An extended review of -ontology theorems
- No -epistemic model can fully explain the indistinguishability of quantum states
- Maximally epistemic interpretations of the quantum state and contextuality
- Can different quantum state vectors correspond to the same physical state? An experimental test
- -epistemic models are exponentially bad at explaining the distinguishability of quantum states
- No Return to Classical Reality
- Psi-Epistemic Theories: The Role of Symmetry
- Quantum epistemology from subquantum ontology: quantum mechanics from theory of classical random fields
- The wavefunction as a true ensemble
- Reality of the quantum state: Towards a stronger ψ-ontology theorem
- A Stronger Theorem Against Macro-realism
- Noncontextuality Inequalities from Antidistinguishability
- How Real are Quantum States in -ontic Models?
- Ontological Models in Quantum Mechanics: What do they tell us?
- Reciprocal ontological models show indeterminism of the order of quantum theory
- Reality, Causality, and Quantum Theory
- Violating the assumption of Measurement Independence in Quantum Foundations
- -Epistemic Models, Einsteinian Intuitions, and No-Gos. A Critical Study of Recent Developments on the Quantum State