Conspiracy in ontological models with measurement contextuality
arXiv:2010.10688 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.103.022211
Abstract
The conspiracy of ontic states responding to measurements contextually to comply with noncontextual quantum mechanical probabilities is analyzed for general ontological models. A general physical picture of ontological space structure and how ontic states are disturbed by measurement contexts is presented. A common assumption in ontological models called lambda-sufficiency is analyzed and argued to be inconsistent with measurement contextuality for ontological models with certain symmetry in ontic space with respect to quantum states and measurements.
arXiv commentminor revision concerning outcome (in)deterministic measurements
References in corpus (8)
- Hidden Variables and the Two Theorems of John Bell
- On the reality of the quantum state
- In defense of the epistemic view of quantum states: a toy theory
- Contextuality for preparations, transformations, and unsharp measurements
- Einstein, incompleteness, and the epistemic view of quantum states
- Are quantum states real?
- Distinct Quantum States Can Be Compatible with a Single State of Reality
- Frame representations of quantum mechanics and the necessity of negativity in quasi-probability representations