Can many-valued logic help to comprehend quantum phenomena?

Abstract

Following Łukasiewicz, we argue that future non-certain events should be described with the use of many-valued, not 2-valued logic. The Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger `paradox' is shown to be an artifact caused by unjustified use of 2-valued logic while considering results of future non-certain events. Description of properties of quantum objects before they are measured should be performed with the use of propositional functions that form a particular model of infinitely-valued Łukasiewicz logic. This model is distinguished by specific operations of negation, conjunction, and disjunction that are used in it.

10 pages, no figures

Cited by in corpus (11)

• Understanding quantum mechanics: a review and synthesis in precise language
• Quantum Supervaluationism
• From the problem of Future Contingents to Peres-Mermin square experiments: An introductory review to Contextuality
• Truth values of quantum phenomena
• Hardy's paradox according to non-classical semantics
• Do quantum propositions obey the principle of excluded middle?
• Quantum state change in light of changes in valuational entropies
• Overturning negative construal of quantum superposition
• The logic of the future in quantum theory
• Violation of Bell Inequalities: Mapping the Conceptual Implications
• Betting on Quantum Objects