Superdeterminism: A Guide for the Perplexed
arXiv:2010.01324
Abstract
Superdeterminism is presently the only known consistent description of nature that is local, deterministic, and can give rise to the observed correlations of quantum mechanics. I here want to explain what makes this approach promising and offer the reader some advice for how to avoid common pitfalls. In particular, I explain why superdeterminism is not a threat to science, is not necessarily finetuned, what the relevance of future input is, and what the open problems are.
20 pages, 1 figure, reference added
References in corpus (8)
- Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical
- The lesson of causal discovery algorithms for quantum correlations: Causal explanations of Bell-inequality violations require fine-tuning
- Bell's Theorem and Locally-Mediated Reformulations of Quantum Mechanics
- The Cellular Automaton Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
- Non-signaling deterministic models for non-local correlations have to be uncomputable
- Are Retrocausal Accounts of Entanglement Unnaturally Fine-Tuned?
- Discretisation of the Bloch Sphere, Fractal Invariant Sets and Bell's Theorem
- On Superdeterministic Rejections of Settings Independence
Cited by in corpus (6)
- The wavefunction as a true ensemble
- Emergence of the Classical from within the Quantum Universe
- Master equations for Wigner functions with spontaneous collapse and their relation to thermodynamic irreversibility
- Quantum theories with local information flow
- Violation of Bell Inequalities: Mapping the Conceptual Implications
- The Quantum Eraser Paradox