Assumption-free derivation of the Bell-type criteria of contextuality/nonlocality
arXiv:2108.05480 · doi:10.3390/e23111543
Abstract
Bell-type criteria of contextuality/nonlocality can be derived without any falsifiable assumptions, such as context-independent mapping (or local causality), free choice, or no-fine-tuning. This is achieved by deriving Bell-type criteria for inconsistently connected systems (i.e., those with disturbance/signaling), based on the generalized definition of contextuality in the Contextuality-by-Default approach, and then specializing these criteria to consistently connected systems.
arXiv comment9 pp; v. 5 is a final version
References in corpus (13)
- The Sheaf-Theoretic Structure Of Non-Locality and Contextuality
- J.S. Bell's Concept of Local Causality
- Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Extended Noncontextuality in a Broad Class of Quantum Mechanical Systems
- Contextuality in Canonical Systems of Random Variables
- All-Possible-Couplings Approach to Measuring Probabilistic Context
- Probabilistic Foundations of Contextuality
- Two faced Janus of quantum nonlocality
- Contextuality and Noncontextuality Measures and Generalized Bell Inequalities for Cyclic Systems
- Contextuality-by-Default description of Bell tests: Contextuality as the rule not as an exception
- On Joint Distributions, Counterfactual Values, and Hidden Variables in Relation to Contextuality
- Classical causal models cannot faithfully explain Bell nonlocality or Kochen-Specker contextuality in arbitrary scenarios
- Relating Causal and Probabilistic Approaches to Contextuality
- Context-independent mapping and free choice are equivalent