Context-independent mapping and free choice are equivalent

Abstract

Free choice (or statistical independence) assumption in a hidden variable model (HVM) means that the settings chosen by experimenters do not depend on the values of the hidden variable. The assumption of context-independent (CI) mapping in an HVM means that the results of a measurement do not depend on settings for other measurements. If the measurements are spacelike separated, this assumption is known as local causality. Both free choice and CI mapping assumptions are considered necessary for derivation of the Bell-type criteria of contextuality/nonlocality. It is known, however, for a variety of special cases, that the two assumptions are not logically independent. We show here, in complete generality, for any system of random variables with or without disturbance/signaling, that an HVM that postulates CI mapping is equivalent to an HVM that postulates free choice. If one denies the possibility that a given empirical scenario can be described by an HVM in which measurements depend on other measurements' settings, free choice violations should be denied too, and vice versa. KEYWORDS: Contextuality; context-independent mapping; free choice; local causality; nonlocality.

arXiv commentThe present version corrects a mistake in the published version (a corrigendum note is submitted as of September 1, 2022)

References in corpus (10)

• A simple test for hidden variables in spin-1 system
• Condition for macroscopic realism beyond the Leggett-Garg inequalities
• Relaxed Bell inequalities and Kochen-Specker theorems
• How much measurement independence is needed in order to demonstrate nonlocality?
• J.S. Bell's Concept of Local Causality
• Arbitrarily small amount of measurement independence is sufficient to manifest quantum nonlocality
• Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Extended Noncontextuality in a Broad Class of Quantum Mechanical Systems
• Relaxed Bell Inequalities with Arbitrary Measurement Dependence for Each Observer
• Violations of locality and free choice are equivalent resources in Bell experiments
• Contextuality and Noncontextuality Measures and Generalized Bell Inequalities for Cyclic Systems

Cited by in corpus (4)

• Contextuality or nonlocality; what would John Bell choose today?
• Assumption-free derivation of the Bell-type criteria of contextuality/nonlocality
• Comparing the cost of violating causal assumptions in Bell experiments: locality, free choice and arrow-of-time
• Hidden variables, free choice, context-independence, and all that