Violations of locality and free choice are equivalent resources in Bell experiments

Abstract

Bell inequalities rest on three fundamental assumptions: realism, locality, and free choice, which lead to nontrivial constraints on correlations in very simple experiments. If we retain realism, then violation of the inequalities implies that at least one of the remaining two assumptions must fail, which can have profound consequences for the causal explanation of the experiment. We investigate the extent to which a given assumption needs to be relaxed for the other to hold at all costs, based on the observation that a violation need not occur on every experimental trial, even when describing correlations violating Bell inequalities. How often this needs to be the case determines the degree of, respectively, locality or free choice in the observed experimental behavior. Despite their disparate character, we show that both assumptions are equally costly. Namely, the resources required to explain the experimental statistics (measured by the frequency of causal interventions of either sort) are exactly the same. Furthermore, we compute such defined measures of locality and free choice for any nonsignaling statistics in a Bell experiment with binary settings, showing that it is directly related to the amount of violation of the so-called Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequalities. This result is theory independent as it refers directly to the experimental statistics. Additionally, we show how the local fraction results for quantum-mechanical frameworks with infinite number of settings translate into analogous statements for the measure of free choice we introduce. Thus, concerning statistics, causal explanations resorting to either locality or free choice violations are fully interchangeable.

arXiv comment10 pages, 3 figures; includes Supplementary Information (5 pages, 2 figures)

References in corpus (45)

• Experimental loophole-free violation of a Bell inequality using entangled electron spins separated by 1.3 km
• Bell nonlocality
• Significant-loophole-free test of Bell's theorem with entangled photons
• A strong loophole-free test of local realism
• Hidden Variables and the Two Theorems of John Bell
• Non-locality and Communication Complexity
• Non-local correlations as an information theoretic resource
• A simple test for hidden variables in spin-1 system
• Bell's theorem for general N-qubit states
• The Communication Cost of Simulating Bell Correlations
• The lesson of causal discovery algorithms for quantum correlations: Causal explanations of Bell-inequality violations require fine-tuning
• Challenging local realism with human choices
• The cost of exactly simulating quantum entanglement with classical communication
• Local deterministic model of singlet state correlations based on relaxing measurement independence
• Maximally Non-Local and Monogamous Quantum Correlations
• Quantum common causes and quantum causal models
• Cosmic Bell Test using Random Measurement Settings from High-Redshift Quasars
• Popescu-Rohrlich correlations as a unit of nonlocality
• Genuine quantum nonlocality in the triangle network
• Relaxed Bell inequalities and Kochen-Specker theorems
• How much measurement independence is needed in order to demonstrate nonlocality?
• The contextual fraction as a measure of contextuality
• Interconversion of Nonlocal Correlations
• The Two Bell's Theorems of John Bell
• A unifying framework for relaxations of the causal assumptions in Bell's theorem
• Arbitrarily small amount of measurement independence is sufficient to manifest quantum nonlocality
• Hidden variable models for quantum theory cannot have any local part
• Testing Bell's Inequality with Cosmic Photons: Closing the Setting-Independence Loophole
• Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Extended Noncontextuality in a Broad Class of Quantum Mechanical Systems
• Bell's Theorem and Locally-Mediated Reformulations of Quantum Mechanics
• Against `Realism'
• The effects of reduced "free will" on Bell-based randomness expansion
• Towards Quantifying Non-Local Information Transfer: Finite-Bit Non-Locality
• Violations of Bell inequalities as lower bounds on the communication cost of non-local correlations
• Contextuality in Three Types of Quantum-Mechanical Systems
• The local content of all pure two-qubit states
• Experimenter's Freedom in Bell's Theorem and Quantum Cryptography
• Two Proofs of Fine's Theorem
• Demonstration of Quantum Nonlocality in presence of Measurement Dependence
• Measurement dependent locality
• Measurement-dependence cost for Bell nonlocality: causal vs retrocausal models
• A short note on the concept of free choice
• The triangle wave versus the cosine: How classical systems can optimally approximate EPR-B correlations
• Proposal to use Humans to switch settings in a Bell experiment
• Bell inequalities with retarded settings

Cited by in corpus (17)

• Contextuality-by-Default description of Bell tests: Contextuality as the rule not as an exception
• Contextuality or nonlocality; what would John Bell choose today?
• Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiments: a discrete data driven approach
• Quantum Nonlocality: how does Nature do it?
• Test of the physical significance of Bell nonlocality
• Can foreign exchange rates violate Bell inequalities?
• Testing of quantum nonlocal correlations under constrained free will and imperfect detectors
• Context-independent mapping and free choice are equivalent
• Causal reappraisal of the quantum three box paradox
• Wigner and friends, a map is not the territory! Contextuality in multi-agent paradoxes
• Causal Networks and Freedom of Choice in Bell's Theorem
• Statistical Contextual Explanation of Quantum Paradoxes
• On safe post-selection for Bell tests with ideal detectors: Causal diagram approach
• Nashian game theory is incompatible with quantum physics
• Differential Geometry of Contextuality
• Hidden variables, free choice, context-independence, and all that
• Comparing the cost of violating causal assumptions in Bell experiments: locality, free choice and arrow-of-time