Causal reappraisal of the quantum three box paradox

Abstract

Quantum three box paradox is a prototypical example of some bizarre predictions for intermediate measurements made on pre- and post-selected systems. Although in principle those effects can be explained by measurement disturbance, it is not clear what mechanisms are required to fully account for the observed correlations. In this paper, this paradox is scrutinised from the causal point of view. We consider an array of potential causal structures behind the experiment, eliminating those without enough explanatory power. This gives a means of differentiating between the various mechanisms in which measurement disturbance can propagate in the system. Specifically, we distinguish whether it is just the measurement outcome or the full measurement context that is required for the causal explanation of the observed statistics. We show that the latter is indispensable, but only when the full statistics is taken into account (which includes checking the third box too). Furthermore, we discuss the realism assumption which posits the existence of preexisting values revealed by measurements. It is shown that in this case measurement disturbance is necessary. Interestingly, without the realism assumption, the original version of the paradox (with just two boxes considered for inspection) can be explained without resorting to any measurement disturbance. These various results illustrate the richness of the paradox which is better appreciated from the causal perspective.

arXiv comment8 pages, 4 figures

References in corpus (32)

• Bell nonlocality
• The lesson of causal discovery algorithms for quantum correlations: Causal explanations of Bell-inequality violations require fine-tuning
• Anomalous Weak Values Are Proofs of Contextuality
• Experimental Realization of the Quantum Box Problem
• Quantum common causes and quantum causal models
• Quantum Cheshire Cats
• The past of a quantum particle
• Opening up the Quantum Three-Box Problem with Undetectable Measurements
• Inferring causal structure: a quantum advantage
• How the result of a single coin toss can turn out to be 100 heads
• A unifying framework for relaxations of the causal assumptions in Bell's theorem
• On the Testability of Causal Models with Latent and Instrumental Variables
• Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Extended Noncontextuality in a Broad Class of Quantum Mechanical Systems
• Graphs for margins of Bayesian networks
• Quantum violation of an instrumental test
• Experimental Test of Nonlocal Causality
• Contextuality in Three Types of Quantum-Mechanical Systems
• Pre- and Post-selection paradoxes and contextuality in quantum mechanics
• The Case of the Disappearing (and Re-Appearing) Particle
• Quantum advantages in classically defined tasks
• The Three-Box Paradox Revisited
• Causal modeling the delayed choice experiment
• Classical Three-Box "paradox"
• Violations of locality and free choice are equivalent resources in Bell experiments
• Comment on: How the result of a single coin toss can turn out to be 100 heads
• Logical Pre- and Post-Selection paradoxes, measurement-disturbance and contextuality
• Logical pre- and post-selection paradoxes are proofs of contextuality
• Quantum Contextuality
• How One Shutter Can Close N Slits
• Detectability, Invasiveness and the Quantum Three Box Paradox
• Reply to "The three-box paradox revisited" by Ravon and Vaidman
• What is paradoxical about the "Three-box paradox"?

Cited by in corpus (1)

• On safe post-selection for Bell tests with ideal detectors: Causal diagram approach