Contextuality in Three Types of Quantum-Mechanical Systems
arXiv:1411.2244 · doi:10.1007/s10701-015-9882-9
Abstract
We present a formal theory of contextuality for a set of random variables grouped into different subsets (contexts) corresponding to different, mutually incompatible conditions. Within each context the random variables are jointly distributed, but across different contexts they are stochastically unrelated. The theory of contextuality is based on the analysis of the extent to which some of these random variables can be viewed as preserving their identity across different contexts when one considers all possible joint distributions imposed on the entire set of the random variables. We illustrate the theory on three systems of traditional interest in quantum physics (and also in non-physical, e.g., behavioral studies). These are systems of the Klyachko-Can-Binicioglu-Shumovsky-type, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bell-type, and Suppes-Zanotti-Leggett-Garg-type. Listed in this order, each of them is formally a special case of the previous one. For each of them we derive necessary and sufficient conditions for contextuality while allowing for experimental errors and contextual biases or signaling. Based on the same principles that underly these derivations we also propose a measure for the degree of contextuality and compute it for the three systems in question.
Foundations of Physics 7, 762-782
References in corpus (8)
- A simple test for hidden variables in spin-1 system
- Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Extended Noncontextuality in a Broad Class of Quantum Mechanical Systems
- Contextuality is About Identity of Random Variables
- Embedding Quantum into Classical: Contextualization vs Conditionalization
- Leggett-Garg Inequalities, Pilot Waves and Contextuality
- No-Forcing and No-Matching Theorems for Classical Probability Applied to Quantum Mechanics
- Generalizing Bell-type and Leggett-Garg-type Inequalities to Systems with Signaling
- Measuring Observable Quantum Contextuality
Cited by in corpus (29)
- No Fine theorem for macrorealism: Limitations of the Leggett-Garg inequality
- Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Extended Noncontextuality in a Broad Class of Quantum Mechanical Systems
- True Contextuality Beats Direct Influences in Human Decision Making
- Is there contextuality in behavioral and social systems?
- Contextuality in Canonical Systems of Random Variables
- Proof of a Conjecture on Contextuality in Cyclic Systems with Binary Variables
- Probabilistic Foundations of Contextuality
- Measures of Contextuality and Noncontextuality
- On Contextuality in Behavioral Data
- Violations of locality and free choice are equivalent resources in Bell experiments
- Contextuality and Noncontextuality Measures and Generalized Bell Inequalities for Cyclic Systems
- Contextuality Analysis of the Double Slit Experiment (With a Glimpse Into Three Slits)
- Contextuality-by-Default description of Bell tests: Contextuality as the rule not as an exception
- Contextuality or nonlocality; what would John Bell choose today?
- Contextuality in spin-orbit laser modes
- On Joint Distributions, Counterfactual Values, and Hidden Variables in Relation to Contextuality
- Replacing Nothing with Something Special: Contextuality-by-Default and Dummy Measurements
- Negative probabilities and Counterfactual Reasoning on the double-slit Experiment
- Quantum Nonlocality: how does Nature do it?
- Counterfactual restrictions and Bell's theorem
- A Survey of Physical Principles Attempting to Define Quantum Mechanics
- Advanced Analysis of Quantum Contextuality in a Psychophysical Double-Detection Experiment
- My discussions of quantum foundations with John Stewart Bell
- Varieties of contextuality based on probability and structural nonembeddability
- Causal reappraisal of the quantum three box paradox
- Statistical Contextual Explanation of Quantum Paradoxes
- Contextuality and dichotomizations of random variables
- On Universality of Classical Probability with Contextually Labeled Random Variables
- On contextuality and logic in scientific discourse: Reply to Aliakbarzadeh, Kitto, and Bruza