Detectability, Invasiveness and the Quantum Three Box Paradox

Abstract

Quantum pre- and post-selection (PPS) paradoxes occur when counterfactual inferences are made about different measurements that might have been performed, between two measurements that are actually performed. The 3 box paradox is the paradigm example of such a paradox, where a ball is placed in one of three boxes and it is inferred that it would have been found, with certainty, both in box 1 and in box 2 had either box been opened on their own. Precisely what is at stake in PPS paradoxes has been unclear, and classical models have been suggested which are supposed to mimic the essential features of the problem. We show that the essential difference between the classical and quantum pre- and post-selection effects lies in the fact that for a quantum PPS paradox to occur the intervening measurement, had it been performed, would need to be invasive but non-detectable. This invasiveness is required even for null result measurements. While some quasi-classical features (such as non-contextuality and macrorealism) are compatible with PPS paradoxes, it seems no fully classical model of the 3 box paradox is possible.

16 pages, no figures

References in corpus (9)

• Contextuality for preparations, transformations, and unsharp measurements
• Einstein, incompleteness, and the epistemic view of quantum states
• Experimental Realization of the Quantum Box Problem
• Opening up the Quantum Three-Box Problem with Undetectable Measurements
• Pre- and Post-selection paradoxes and contextuality in quantum mechanics
• Quantum advantages in classically defined tasks
• The Three-Box Paradox Revisited
• Logical Pre- and Post-Selection paradoxes, measurement-disturbance and contextuality
• Reply to "The three-box paradox revisited" by Ravon and Vaidman

Cited by in corpus (9)

• Ambiguous measurements, signalling and violations of Leggett-Garg inequalities
• Logical pre- and post-selection paradoxes are proofs of contextuality
• Signifying the Schrodinger cat in the context of testing macroscopic realism
• How (Not) to Understand Weak Measurements of Velocities
• Constraints on Macroscopic Realism Without Assuming Non-Invasive Measurability
• Weak versus deterministic macroscopic realism, and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen's elements of reality
• Causal reappraisal of the quantum three box paradox
• A macroscopic quantum three-box paradox: finding consistency with weak macroscopic realism
• Completely real? A critical note on the claims by Colbeck and Renner