Comment on: How the result of a single coin toss can turn out to be 100 heads
arXiv:1410.8510 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.118901
Abstract
Ferrie and Combes [PRL 113 120404 (2014)] produce a classical measurement scheme that supposedly exhibits `anomalous' weak values. I show that their model is flawed due to an incorrect definition of the weak value. As a consequence their claims are invalid.
Includes a brief response to the the published reply [Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 118902 (2015)]
Cited by in corpus (8)
- Weak Values are Interference Phenomena
- Anomalous Weak Values and the Violation of a Multiple-measurement Leggett-Garg Inequality
- Interference experiment, anomalous weak value and Leggett-Garg test of macrorealism
- Weak values in a classical theory with an epistemic restriction
- Gravitational Wave Detection via Weak Measurements Amplification
- Causal reappraisal of the quantum three box paradox
- Novel approach to neutron electric dipole moment search using weak measurement
- Nonclassical correlations in decaying systems