Comparing the cost of violating causal assumptions in Bell experiments: locality, free choice and arrow-of-time

Abstract

The causal modelling of Bell experiments relies on three fundamental assumptions: locality, freedom of choice, and arrow-of-time. It turns out that nature violates Bell inequalities, which entails the failure of at least one of those assumptions. Since rejecting any of them - even partially - proves to be enough to explain the observed correlations, it is natural to ask about the cost in each case. This paper follows up on the results in PNAS 118 e2020569118 (2021), showing the equivalence between the locality and free choice assumptions, adding to the picture retro-causal models explaining the observed correlations. Here, we consider more challenging causal scenarios which allow only single-arrow type violations of a given assumption. The figure of merit chosen for the comparison of the causal cost is defined as the minimal frequency of violation of the respective assumption required for a simulation of the observed experimental statistics.

arXiv comment14 pages, 4 figures

References in corpus (27)

• Experimental loophole-free violation of a Bell inequality using entangled electron spins separated by 1.3 km
• Bell nonlocality
• Significant-loophole-free test of Bell's theorem with entangled photons
• A strong loophole-free test of local realism
• The Sheaf-Theoretic Structure Of Non-Locality and Contextuality
• The lesson of causal discovery algorithms for quantum correlations: Causal explanations of Bell-inequality violations require fine-tuning
• Challenging local realism with human choices
• Local deterministic model of singlet state correlations based on relaxing measurement independence
• Maximally Non-Local and Monogamous Quantum Correlations
• Quantum common causes and quantum causal models
• Cosmic Bell Test using Random Measurement Settings from High-Redshift Quasars
• How much measurement independence is needed in order to demonstrate nonlocality?
• Rethinking Superdeterminism
• The contextual fraction as a measure of contextuality
• J.S. Bell's Concept of Local Causality
• The Two Bell's Theorems of John Bell
• A unifying framework for relaxations of the causal assumptions in Bell's theorem
• Is a time symmetric interpretation of quantum theory possible without retrocausality?
• Arbitrarily small amount of measurement independence is sufficient to manifest quantum nonlocality
• Hidden variable models for quantum theory cannot have any local part
• Bell's Theorem and Locally-Mediated Reformulations of Quantum Mechanics
• On modifications of Reichenbach's principle of common cause in light of Bell's theorem
• The local content of all pure two-qubit states
• Violations of locality and free choice are equivalent resources in Bell experiments
• Measurement-dependence cost for Bell nonlocality: causal vs retrocausal models
• A mathematical framework for operational fine tunings
• Context-independent mapping and free choice are equivalent