Measurement-dependence cost for Bell nonlocality: causal vs retrocausal models

Abstract

Device independent protocols based on Bell nonlocality, such as quantum key distribution and randomness generation, must ensure no adversary can have prior knowledge of the measurement outcomes. This requires a measurement independence assumption: that the choice of measurement is uncorrelated with any other underlying variables that influence the measurement outcomes. Conversely, relaxing measurement independence allows for a fully `causal' simulation of Bell nonlocality. We construct the most efficient such simulation, as measured by the mutual information between the underlying variables and the measurement settings, for the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) scenario, and find that the maximal quantum violation requires a mutual information of just $\sim 0.080$ bits. Any physical device built to implement this simulation allows an adversary to have full knowledge of a cryptographic key or `random' numbers generated by a device independent protocol based on violation of the CHSH inequality. We also show that a previous model for the CHSH scenario, requiring only $\sim 0.046$ bits to simulate the maximal quantum violation, corresponds to the most efficient `retrocausal' simulation, in which future measurement settings necessarily influence earlier source variables. This may be viewed either as an unphysical limitation of the prior model, or as an argument for retrocausality on the grounds of its greater efficiency. Causal and retrocausal models are also discussed for maximally entangled two-qubit states, as well as superdeterministic, one-sided and zigzag causal models.

arXiv comment16 pages, 7 figures

References in corpus (29)

• Experimental loophole-free violation of a Bell inequality using entangled electron spins separated by 1.3 km
• Bell nonlocality
• Device-independent security of quantum cryptography against collective attacks
• Random Numbers Certified by Bell's Theorem
• No Signalling and Quantum Key Distribution
• The lesson of causal discovery algorithms for quantum correlations: Causal explanations of Bell-inequality violations require fine-tuning
• Private Randomness Expansion With Untrusted Devices
• Challenging local realism with human choices
• Local deterministic model of singlet state correlations based on relaxing measurement independence
• Relaxed Bell inequalities and Kochen-Specker theorems
• How much measurement independence is needed in order to demonstrate nonlocality?
• A Neglected Route to Realism About Quantum Mechanics
• Efficient quantum key distribution secure against no-signalling eavesdroppers
• A unifying framework for relaxations of the causal assumptions in Bell's theorem
• Is a time symmetric interpretation of quantum theory possible without retrocausality?
• Arbitrarily small amount of measurement independence is sufficient to manifest quantum nonlocality
• Simulating quantum correlations as a distributed sampling problem
• Does Time-Symmetry Imply Retrocausality? How the Quantum World Says "Maybe"
• Disentangling the Quantum World
• The effects of reduced "free will" on Bell-based randomness expansion
• Bell tests with min-entropy sources
• Can a Future Choice Affect a Past Measurement's Outcome?
• Relaxed Bell Inequalities with Arbitrary Measurement Dependence for Each Observer
• Experimenter's Freedom in Bell's Theorem and Quantum Cryptography
• Bell's Theorem and the Causal Arrow of Time
• Optimal free-will on one side in reproducing the singlet correlation
• Q-functions as models of physical reality
• Measurement dependent locality
• A Lenient Causal Arrow of Time?

Cited by in corpus (11)

• Violations of locality and free choice are equivalent resources in Bell experiments
• Experimental nonclassicality in a causal network without assuming freedom of choice
• Superdeterministic hidden-variables models II: conspiracy
• Detection loophole in quantum causality and its countermeasures
• Test of the physical significance of Bell nonlocality
• Relaxed Bell inequalities as a trade-off relation between measurement dependence and hiddenness
• Causal Networks and Freedom of Choice in Bell's Theorem
• Parameter Dependence and Bell nonlocality
• Trade-off relations between measurement dependence and hidden information for factorizable hidden variable models
• Events in quantum mechanics are maximally non-absolute
• Comparing the cost of violating causal assumptions in Bell experiments: locality, free choice and arrow-of-time