Superdeterministic hidden-variables models II: conspiracy

Abstract

We prove that superdeterministic models of quantum mechanics are conspiratorial in a mathematically well-defined sense, by further development of the ideas presented in a previous article $\mathcal{A}$. We consider a Bell scenario where, in each run and at each wing, the experimenter chooses one of $N$ devices to determine the local measurement setting. We prove, without assuming any features of quantum statistics, that superdeterministic models of this scenario must have a finely-tuned distribution of hidden variables. Specifically, fine-tuning is required so that the measurement statistics depend on the measurement settings but not on the details of how the settings are chosen. We quantify this as the overhead fine-tuning $F$ of the model, and show that $F>0$ (corresponding to `fine-tuned') for any $N>1$. The notion of fine-tuning assumes that arbitrary (`nonequilibrium') hidden-variables distributions are possible in principle. We also show how to quantify superdeterministic conspiracy without using nonequilibrium. This second approach is based on the fact that superdeterministic correlations can mimic actual signalling. We argue that an analogous situation occurs in equilibrium where, for every run, the devices that the hidden variables are correlated with are coincidentally the same as the devices in fact used. This results in extremely large superdeterministic correlations, which we quantify as a drop of an appropriately defined formal entropy. Nonlocal and retrocausal models turn out to be non-conspiratorial according to both approaches.

arXiv commentPost-print version

References in corpus (10)

• The lesson of causal discovery algorithms for quantum correlations: Causal explanations of Bell-inequality violations require fine-tuning
• Dynamical Origin of Quantum Probabilities
• Relaxed Bell inequalities and Kochen-Specker theorems
• Signal-Locality in Hidden-Variables Theories
• Astrophysical and Cosmological Tests of Quantum Theory
• Relaxed Bell Inequalities with Arbitrary Measurement Dependence for Each Observer
• The Invariant Set Postulate: A New Geometric Framework for the Foundations of Quantum Theory and the Role Played by Gravity
• Universal Signature of Non-Quantum Systems
• Measurement-dependence cost for Bell nonlocality: causal vs retrocausal models
• Superdeterministic hidden-variables models I: nonequilibrium and signalling

Cited by in corpus (6)

• Supermeasured: Violating Bell-Statistical Independence without violating physical statistical independence
• The wavefunction as a true ensemble
• A Toy Model for Local and Deterministic Wave-function Collapse
• Superdeterministic hidden-variables models I: nonequilibrium and signalling
• Analysis of the superdeterministic Invariant-set theory in a hidden-variable setting
• Taxonomy for Physics Beyond Quantum Mechanics