A mathematical framework for operational fine tunings

Abstract

In the framework of ontological models, the inherently nonclassical features of quantum theory always seem to involve properties that are fine tuned, i.e. properties that hold at the operational level but break at the ontological level. Their appearance at the operational level is due to unexplained special choices of the ontological parameters, which is what we mean by a fine tuning. Famous examples of such features are contextuality and nonlocality. In this article, we develop a theory-independent mathematical framework for characterizing operational fine tunings. These are distinct from causal fine tunings -- already introduced by Wood and Spekkens in [NJP,17 033002(2015)] -- as the definition of an operational fine tuning does not involve any assumptions about the underlying causal structure. We show how known examples of operational fine tunings, such as Spekkens' generalized contextuality, violation of parameter independence in Bell experiment, and ontological time asymmetry, fit into our framework. We discuss the possibility of finding new fine tunings and we use the framework to shed new light on the relation between nonlocality and generalized contextuality. Although nonlocality has often been argued to be a form of contextuality, this is only true when nonlocality consists of a violation of parameter independence. We formulate our framework also in the language of category theory using the concept of functors.

Final version with minor corrections with respect to the previous one and written using the Quantum journal template. 34 pages, 10 figures

References in corpus (8)

• Is the quantum state real? An extended review of $\psi$-ontology theorems
• Preparation contextuality powers parity-oblivious multiplexing
• Information-Theoretic Implications of Quantum Causal Structures
• Inferring causal structure: a quantum advantage
• Wigner function negativity and contextuality in quantum computation on rebits
• Unscrambling the omelette of causation and inference: The framework of causal-inferential theories
• Contextuality in entanglement-assisted one-shot classical communication
• Contextuality, Fine-Tuning, and Teleological Explanation

Cited by in corpus (7)

• Why interference phenomena do not capture the essence of quantum theory
• Aspects of the phenomenology of interference that are genuinely nonclassical
• Alternative robust ways of witnessing nonclassicality in the simplest scenario
• Connecting XOR and XOR* games
• Theory-independent monitoring of the decoherence of a superconducting qubit with generalized contextuality
• Comparing the cost of violating causal assumptions in Bell experiments: locality, free choice and arrow-of-time
• Quantum description of reality is epistemically incomplete