A short note on the concept of free choice

Abstract

We argue that the concepts of "freedom of choice" and of "causal order" are intrinsically linked: a choice is considered "free" if it is correlated only to variables in its causal future. We discuss the implications of this to Bell-type scenarios, where two separate measurements are carried out, neither of which lies in the causal future of the other, and where one typically assumes that the measurement settings are chosen freely. Furthermore, we refute a recent criticism made by Ghirardi and Romano in [arXiv:1301.5040] and [arXiv:1302.1635] that we used an unphysical freedom of choice assumption in our previous works, [Nat. Commun. 2, 411 (2011)] and [Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 150402 (2012)].

1 page, 1 figure

References in corpus (3)

• Is a system's wave function in one-to-one correspondence with its elements of reality?
• No extension of quantum theory can have improved predictive power
• An experimental test of all theories with predictive power beyond quantum theory

Cited by in corpus (6)

• Violations of locality and free choice are equivalent resources in Bell experiments
• True randomness from realistic quantum devices
• An impossibility theorem for Parameter Independent hidden variable theories
• Could the physical world be emergent instead of fundamental, and why should we ask? (short version)
• Fleeting Critical Review of the Recent Ontic Breakthrough in Quantum Mechanics
• Relativistic Causality vs. No-Signaling as the limiting paradigm for correlations in physical theories