An impossibility theorem for Parameter Independent hidden variable theories

Abstract

Recently, Roger Colbeck and Renato Renner (C&R) have claimed that '[n]o extension of quantum theory can have improved predictive power'. If correct, this is a spectacular impossibility theorem for hidden variable theories, which is more general than the theorems of Bell and Leggett. C&R's claim essentially means that in any hidden variable theory that is compatible with quantum-mechanical predictions, probabilities of measurement outcomes are independent of these hidden variables. On closer inspection, however, the generality and validity of the claim can be contested. First, it is based on an assumption called 'Freedom of Choice'. As the name suggests, this assumption involves the independence of an experimenter's choice of measurement settings. But in the way C&R define this assumption, a no-signalling condition is surreptitiously presupposed, making the assumption less innocent than it sounds. When using this definition, any hidden variable theory violating Parameter Independence, such as Bohmian Mechanics, is immediately shown to be incompatible with quantum-mechanical predictions. Also, the argument of C&R is hard to follow and their mathematical derivation contains several gaps, some of which cannot be closed in the way they suggest. We shall show that these gaps can be filled. The issue with the 'Freedom of Choice' assumption can be circumvented by explicitly assuming Parameter Independence. This makes the result less general, but better founded. We then obtain an impossibility theorem for hidden variable theories satisfying Parameter Independence only. So, while quantum mechanics itself satisfies Parameter Independence, if a variable is added that changes the outcome probabilities, however slightly, Parameter Independence must be violated.

42 pages, 2 figures

References in corpus (13)

• On the reality of the quantum state
• Is the quantum state real? An extended review of $\psi$-ontology theorems
• Is a system's wave function in one-to-one correspondence with its elements of reality?
• Maximally Non-Local and Monogamous Quantum Correlations
• No extension of quantum theory can have improved predictive power
• Embezzling Entangled Quantum States
• Testing quantum correlations versus single-particle properties within Leggett's model and beyond
• About possible extensions of quantum theory
• A short note on the concept of free choice
• Determination of hidden variable models reproducing the spin-singlet
• Comment on "Is a system's wave function in one-to-one correspondence with its elements of reality?" [arXiv:1111.6597]
• On the Colbeck-Renner Theorem
• A general theorem on local parts of hidden variable models

Cited by in corpus (4)

• Could wavefunctions simultaneously represent knowledge and reality?
• Completely real? A critical note on the claims by Colbeck and Renner
• Non-locality and quasiclassical reality in Kent's formulation of relativistic quantum theory
• Epistemic Boundaries and Quantum Uncertainty: What Local Observers Can (Not) Predict