Data analysis of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm laboratory experiments
arXiv:1312.6361 · doi:10.1117/12.2021860
Abstract
Data sets produced by three different Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm (EPRB) experiments are tested against the hypothesis that the statistics of this data is described by quantum theory. Although these experiments generate data that violate Bell inequalities for suitable choices of the time-coincidence window, the analysis shows that it is highly unlikely that these data sets are compatible with the quantum theoretical description of the EPRB experiment, suggesting that the popular statements that EPRB experiments agree with quantum theory lack a solid scientific basis and that more precise experiments are called for.
arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1112.2629
Cited by in corpus (16)
- Reality without Realism: On the Ontological and Epistemological Architecture of Quantum Mechanics
- Is the Moon there if nobody looks: Bell Inequalities and Physical Reality
- Can we close the Bohr-Einstein quantum debate?
- EPR Paradox, Quantum Nonlocality and Physical Reality
- Is Einsteinian no-signalling violated in Bell Tests?
- Contextuality-by-Default description of Bell tests: Contextuality as the rule not as an exception
- Contextuality or nonlocality; what would John Bell choose today?
- Quantum theory as plausible reasoning applied to data obtained by robust experiments
- Counterfactual Definiteness and Bell's Inequality
- Quantum Nonlocality: how does Nature do it?
- My discussions of quantum foundations with John Stewart Bell
- Violation of CHSH inequality and marginal laws in mixed sequential measurements with order effects
- Violation of the Bell-CHSH inequality and marginal laws in a single-entity Bell-test experiment
- Quantum entanglement partly demystified
- Unconditional quantum correlations do not violate Bell's inequality
- Quantum entanglement in physical and cognitive systems: a conceptual analysis and a general representation