Bell's theorem allows local theories of quantum mechanics
arXiv:2211.01331 · doi:10.1038/s41567-022-01831-5
Abstract
A recent Nature Physics editorial (Nat. Phys. (2022) 18, 961) falsely claims ``any theory that uses hidden variables still requires non-local physics.'' We correct this claim and explain why it is important to get this right.
2 pages, no figures. Submitted version; accepted for publication as correspondence in Nature Physics
References in corpus (1)
Cited by in corpus (14)
- Contextuality or nonlocality; what would John Bell choose today?
- Quantum Nonlocality: how does Nature do it?
- The future of secure communications: device independence in quantum key distribution
- My discussions of quantum foundations with John Stewart Bell
- Taxonomy for Physics Beyond Quantum Mechanics
- A Family of Local Deterministic Models for Singlet Quantum State Correlations
- Tracing quantum correlations back to collective interferences
- Statistical Contextual Explanation of Quantum Paradoxes
- The shadows of quantum gravity on Bell's inequality
- Sufficiency of the counterfactual account of Lüders' rule to rule out ontological models of quantum mechanics
- Quantum theories with local information flow
- Solitons, chaos, and quantum phenomena: a deterministic approach to the Schrödinger equation
- Minimal Proper Time and Deterministic Microstates: Emergent Quantum Fields and Relativistic Spacetime
- Limits of Absoluteness of Observed Events in Timelike Scenarios: A No-Go Theorem