Universality of citation distributions: towards an objective measure of scientific impact

Abstract

We study the distributions of citations received by a single publication within several disciplines, spanning broad areas of science. We show that the probability that an article is cited $c$ times has large variations between different disciplines, but all distributions are rescaled on a universal curve when the relative indicator $c_f=c/c_0$ is considered, where $c_0$ is the average number of citations per article for the discipline. In addition we show that the same universal behavior occurs when citation distributions of articles published in the same field, but in different years, are compared. These findings provide a strong validation of $c_f$ as an unbiased indicator for citation performance across disciplines and years. Based on this indicator, we introduce a generalization of the h-index suitable for comparing scientists working in different fields.

7 pages, 5 figures. accepted for publication in Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA

References in corpus (4)

• Does the h-index have predictive power?
• Citation Statistics
• Scaling and universality in proportional elections
• National Scientific Facilities and Their Science Impact on Non-Biomedical Research

Cited by in corpus (83)

• The Matthew effect in empirical data
• Defining and identifying Sleeping Beauties in science
• Diffusion of scientific credits and the ranking of scientists
• World citation and collaboration networks: uncovering the role of geography in science
• A review of the characteristics of 108 author-level bibliometric indicators
• Persistence and Uncertainty in the Academic Career
• Career on the Move: Geography, Stratification, and Scientific Impact
• Quantifying patterns of research interest evolution
• Who is the best player ever? A complex network analysis of the history of professional tennis
• The Chaperone Effect in Scientific Publishing
• Computational Socioeconomics
• A reverse engineering approach to the suppression of citation biases reveals universal properties of citation distributions
• Human Activity in the Web
• Identification of milestone papers through time-balanced network centrality
• Stochastic dynamical model of a growing network based on self-exciting point process
• Taking census of physics
• Inheritance patterns in citation networks reveal scientific memes
• Will This Paper Increase Your h-index? Scientific Impact Prediction
• The statistical laws of popularity: Universal properties of the box office dynamics of motion pictures
• Inequality and cumulative advantage in science careers: a case study of high-impact journals
• Zipf's law and log-normal distributions in measures of scientific output across fields and institutions: 40 years of Slovenia's research as an example
• Unraveling the dynamics of growth, aging and inflation for citations to scientific articles from specific research fields
• In science "there is no bad publicity": Papers criticized in comments have high scientific impact
• Become a better you: correlation between the change of research direction and the change of scientific performance
• Bibliometric Indicators of Young Authors in Astrophysics: Can Later Stars be Predicted?
• Completing $h$
• Network-based statistical comparison of citation topology of bibliographic databases
• The distribution of shortest path lengths in a class of node duplication network models
• The disruption index is biased by citation inflation
• Prediction Methods and Applications in the Science of Science: A Survey
• From Who You Know to What You Read: Augmenting Scientific Recommendations with Implicit Social Networks
• Geography of Science: Competitiveness and Inequality
• A Case Study of the Arbitrariness of the h-Index and the Highly-Cited-Publications Indicator
• Assessing the accuracy of the h and g indexes for measuring researchers' productivity
• Detrending career statistics in professional baseball: Accounting for the steroids era and beyond
• Citation count distributions for large monodisciplinary journals
• The disruption index suffers from citation inflation and is confounded by shifts in scholarly citation practice
• The transition towards immortality: non-linear autocatalytic growth of citations to scientific papers
• Relational hyperevent models for the coevolution of coauthoring and citation networks
• The citation disadvantage of clinical research
• Nature, Science, and PNAS -- Disciplinary profiles and impact
• Fat tailed distributions for deaths in conflicts and disasters
• Scientometric engineering: Exploring citation dynamics via arXiv eprints
• Field-normalized Impact Factors: A Comparison of Rescaling versus Fractionally Counted IFs
• Higher-order rich-club phenomenon in collaborative research grants
• Propinquity drives the emergence of network structure and density
• Towards a more realistic citation model: The key role of research team sizes
• Individual and team performance in cricket
• Axiomatic Quantification of Co-authors' Relative Contributions
• A SIR epidemic model for citation dynamics
• Anomalous diffusion in the citation time series of scientific publications
• Fractional counting of authorship to quantify scientific research output
• The Evolution of Competitiveness across Economic, Innovation and Knowledge production activities
• The advantages of interdisciplinarity in modern science
• The Sci-hub Effect: Sci-hub downloads lead to more article citations
• Are human interactivity times lognormal?
• Quantifying Success in Science: An Overview
• Do 'altmetric mentions' follow Power Laws? Evidence from social media mention data in Altmetric.com
• How the fittest compete for leadership: A tale of tails
• Two indicators rule them all: Mean and standard deviation used to calculate other journal indicators based on log-normal distribution of citation counts
• On the evolution and utility of annual citation indices
• Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS ("Leiden") evaluations of research performance
• Fractional counting of citations in research evaluation: An option for cross- and interdisciplinary assessments
• Characterizing References from Different Disciplines: A Perspective of Citation Content Analysis
• Enabling Discoveries: Thirty Years of Advanced Technologies and Instrumentation at the National Science Foundation
• Bounded Rationality in Scholarly Knowledge Discovery
• Clean up or mess up: the effect of sampling biases on measurements of degree distributions in mobile phone datasets
• Addressing Time Bias in Bipartite Graph Ranking for Important Node Identification
• Uncertain research country rankings. Should we continue producing uncertain rankings?
• Source normalized indicators of citation impact: An overview of different approaches and an empirical comparison
• On the categorization of scientific citation profiles in computer sciences
• Conservative adventurers have more future academic impact
• Universal growth of social groups: empirical analysis and modeling
• Citation method, please? A case study in astrophysics
• A systematic empirical comparison of different approaches for normalizing citation impact indicators
• Coevolution of theoretical and applied research: a case study of graphene research by temporal and geographic analysis
• How Can Journal Impact Factors be Normalized across Fields of Science? An Assessment in terms of Percentile Ranks and Fractional Counts
• A Measure of Research Taste
• An Overview on Evaluating and Predicting Scholarly Article Impact
• Fractional stochastic model of citation dynamics with memory and volatility
• Super-teams or fair leagues? Parity policies by powerful regulators don't prevent capture
• Turning the tables in citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents
• A two-dimensional index to quantify both scientific research impact and scope