Identification of milestone papers through time-balanced network centrality
arXiv:1608.08414 · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.005
Abstract
Citations between scientific papers and related bibliometric indices, such as the -index for authors and the impact factor for journals, are being increasingly used - often in controversial ways - as quantitative tools for research evaluation. Yet, a fundamental research question remains still open: to which extent do quantitative metrics capture the significance of scientific works? We analyze the network of citations among the papers published by the American Physical Society (APS) journals between 1893 and 2009, and focus on the comparison of metrics built on the citation count with network-based metrics. We contrast five article-level metrics with respect to the rankings that they assign to a set of fundamental papers, called Milestone Letters, carefully selected by the APS editors for "making long-lived contributions to physics, either by announcing significant discoveries, or by initiating new areas of research". A new metric, which combines PageRank centrality with the explicit requirement that paper score is not biased by paper age, is the best-performing metric overall in identifying the Milestone Letters. The lack of time bias in the new metric makes it also possible to use it to compare papers of different age on the same scale. We find that network-based metrics identify the Milestone Letters better than metrics based on the citation count, which suggests that the structure of the citation network contains information that can be used to improve the ranking of scientific publications. The methods and results presented here are relevant for all evolving systems where network centrality metrics are applied, for example the World Wide Web and online social networks. An interactive Web platform where it is possible to view the ranking of the APS papers by rescaled PageRank is available at the address \url{http://www.sciencenow.info}.
Main text (pp. 1-12) + Appendices (pp. 13-18)
References in corpus (9)
- Universality of citation distributions: towards an objective measure of scientific impact
- Finding Scientific Gems with Google
- Defining and identifying Sleeping Beauties in science
- Diffusion of scientific credits and the ranking of scientists
- Ranking Scientific Publications Using a Simple Model of Network Traffic
- The Scientific Competitiveness of Nations
- Promise and Pitfalls of Extending Google's PageRank Algorithm to Citation Networks
- A reverse engineering approach to the suppression of citation biases reveals universal properties of citation distributions
- National Scientific Facilities and Their Science Impact on Non-Biomedical Research