Completing $h$

Abstract

Nearly a decade ago, the science community was introduced to the $h$-index, a proposed statistical measure of the collective impact of the publications of any individual researcher. It is of course undeniable that any method of reducing a complex data set to a single number will necessarily have certain limitations and introduce certain biases. However, in this paper we point out that the definition of the $h$-index actually suffers from something far deeper: a hidden mathematical incompleteness intrinsic to its definition. In particular, we point out that one critical step within the definition of $h$ has been missed until now, resulting in an index which only achieves its stated objectives under certain rather limited circumstances. For example, this incompleteness explains why the $h$-index ultimately has more utility in certain scientific subfields than others. In this paper, we expose the origin of this incompleteness and then also propose a method of completing the definition of $h$ in a way which remains close to its original guiding principle. As a result, this "completed" $h$ not only reduces to the usual $h$ in cases where the $h$-index already achieves its objectives, but also extends the validity of the $h$-index into situations where it currently does not.

13 pages, LaTeX, 2 figures, 1 table

References in corpus (19)

• An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output
• Does the h-index have predictive power?
• Universality of citation distributions: towards an objective measure of scientific impact
• Stretched exponential distributions in Nature and Economy: ``Fat tails'' with characteristic scales
• An index to quantify an individual's scientific research valid across disciplines
• An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output that takes into account the effect of multiple coauthorship
• The w-index: A significant improvement of the h-index
• Rescaling citations of publications in physics
• A quantitative analysis of measures of quality in science
• Testing the fairness of citation indicators for comparison across scientific domains: the case of fractional citation counts
• Twenty Hirsch index variants and other indicators giving more or less preference to highly cited papers
• Statistical regularities in the rank-citation profile of scientists
• A Case Study of the Modified Hirsch Index hm Accounting for Multiple Co-authors
• A Case Study of the Arbitrariness of the h-Index and the Highly-Cited-Publications Indicator
• Detrending career statistics in professional baseball: Accounting for the steroids era and beyond
• The Z-index: A geometric representation of productivity and impact which accounts for information in the entire rank-citation profile
• Effects of Publications in Proceedings on the Measure of the Core Size of Coauthors
• Impact vitality: an indicator based on citing publications in search of excellent scientists
• Inconsistencies of the Highly-Cited-Publications Indicator