A Case Study of the Modified Hirsch Index hm Accounting for Multiple Co-authors

Abstract

J. E. Hirsch (2005) introduced the h-index to quantify an individual's scientific research output by the largest number h of a scientist's papers, that received at least h citations. This so-called Hirsch index can be easily modified to take multiple co-authorship into account by counting the papers fractionally according to (the inverse of) the number of authors. I have worked out 26 empirical cases of physicists to illustrate the effect of this modification. Although the correlation between the original and the modified Hirsch index is relatively strong, the arrangement of the datasets is significantly different depending on whether they are put into order according to the values of either the original or the modified index.

29 pages, including 2 tables, 3 figures with 7 plots altogether, accepted for publication in J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Techn. vol. 60 (5) 2009

References in corpus (1)

• A case study of the Hirsch index for 26 non-prominent physicists

Cited by in corpus (8)

• An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output that takes into account the effect of multiple coauthorship
• The importance of accounting for the number of co-authors and their order when assessing research performance at the individual level in the life sciences
• Twenty Hirsch index variants and other indicators giving more or less preference to highly cited papers
• ${\mathbf{h}}_{\alpha }$: An index to quantify an individual's scientific leadership
• Completing $h$
• A Case Study of the Arbitrariness of the h-Index and the Highly-Cited-Publications Indicator
• Analyzing research performance: proposition of a new complementary index
• Measuring the evaluation and impact of scientific works and their authors