: An index to quantify an individual's scientific leadership
arXiv:1810.01605 · doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2994-1
Abstract
The person is the dominant person in a group. We define the -author of a paper as the author of the paper with the highest -index among all the coauthors, and an -paper of a scientist as a paper authored or coauthored by the scientist where he/she is the -author. For most but not all papers in the literature there is only one -author. We define the index of a scientist as the number of papers in the -core of the scientist (i.e. the set of papers that contribute to the -index of the scientist) where this scientist is the -author. We also define the index of a scientist as the number of -papers of this scientist that have citations. and contain similar information, while is conceptually more appealing it is harder to obtain from existing databases, hence of less current practical interest. We propose that the and/or indices, or other variants discussed in the paper, are useful complements to the -index of a scientist to quantify his/her scientific achievement, that rectify an inherent drawback of the -index, its inability to distinguish between authors with different coauthorships patterns. A high index in conjunction with a high ratio is a hallmark of scientific leadership.
arXiv commentSome changes in response to referees' comments
References in corpus (6)
- An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output
- An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output that takes into account the effect of multiple coauthorship
- A Case Study of the Modified Hirsch Index hm Accounting for Multiple Co-authors
- Central indexes to the citation distribution: A complement to the h-index
- Assessing the true role of coauthors in the h-index measure of an author scientific impact
- A modification to Hirsch index allowing comparisons across different scientific fields