A Case Study of the Arbitrariness of the h-Index and the Highly-Cited-Publications Indicator
arXiv:1302.6582 · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2012.12.006
Abstract
The arbitrariness of the h-index becomes evident, when one requires q*h instead of h citations as the threshold for the definition of the index, thus changing the size of the core of the most influential publications of a dataset. I analyze the citation records of 26 physicists in order to determine how much the prefactor q influences the ranking. Likewise, the arbitrariness of the highly-cited-publications indicator is due to the threshold value, given either as an absolute number of citations or as a percentage of highly cited papers. The analysis of the 26 citation records shows that the changes in the rankings in dependence on these thresholds are rather large and comparable with the respective changes for the h-index.
arXiv comment16 pages, 3 tables, 5 figures. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1302.6396
References in corpus (6)
- An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output
- Universality of citation distributions: towards an objective measure of scientific impact
- The w-index: A significant improvement of the h-index
- A quantitative analysis of measures of quality in science
- Twenty Hirsch index variants and other indicators giving more or less preference to highly cited papers
- A Case Study of the Modified Hirsch Index hm Accounting for Multiple Co-authors