Distributions for cited articles from individual subjects and years
arXiv:1510.08881 · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2014.08.001
Abstract
The citations to a set of academic articles are typically unevenly shared, with many articles attracting few citations and few attracting many. It is important to know more precisely how citations are distributed in order to help statistical analyses of citations, especially for sets of articles from a single discipline and a small range of years, as normally used for research evaluation. This article fits discrete versions of the power law, the lognormal distribution and the hooked power law to 20 different Scopus categories, using citations to articles published in 2004 and ignoring uncited articles. The results show that, despite its popularity, the power law is not a suitable model for collections of articles from a single subject and year, even for the purpose of estimating the slope of the tail of the citation data. Both the hooked power law and the lognormal distributions fit best for some subjects but neither is a universal optimal choice and parameter estimates for both seem to be unreliable. Hence only the hooked power law and discrete lognormal distributions should be considered for subject-and-year-based citation analysis in future and parameter estimates should always be interpreted cautiously.
References in corpus (3)
Cited by in corpus (12)
- Regression for citation data: An evaluation of different methods
- The discretised lognormal and hooked power law distributions for complete citation data: Best options for modelling and regression
- Geometric journal impact factors correcting for individual highly cited articles
- The precision of the arithmetic mean, geometric mean and percentiles for citation data: An experimental simulation modelling approach
- Are there too many uncited articles? Zero inflated variants of the discretised lognormal and hooked power law distributions
- National, disciplinary and temporal variations in the extent to which articles with more authors have more impact: Evidence from a geometric field normalised citation indicator
- The influence of time and discipline on the magnitude of correlations between citation counts and quality scores
- Citation count distributions for large monodisciplinary journals
- The inconsistency of h-index: a mathematical analysis
- Research assessment by percentile-based double rank analysis
- The Accuracy of Confidence Intervals for Field Normalised Indicators
- Confidence intervals for normalised citation counts: Can they delimit underlying research capability?