The discretised lognormal and hooked power law distributions for complete citation data: Best options for modelling and regression
arXiv:1601.00473 · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2015.12.007
Abstract
Identifying the statistical distribution that best fits citation data is important to allow robust and powerful quantitative analyses. Whilst previous studies have suggested that both the hooked power law and discretised lognormal distributions fit better than the power law and negative binomial distributions, no comparisons so far have covered all articles within a discipline, including those that are uncited. Based on an analysis of 26 different Scopus subject areas in seven different years, this article reports comparisons of the discretised lognormal and the hooked power law with citation data, adding 1 to citation counts in order to include zeros. The hooked power law fits better in two thirds of the subject/year combinations tested for journal articles that are at least three years old, including most medical, life and natural sciences, and for virtually all subject areas for younger articles. Conversely, the discretised lognormal tends to fit best for arts, humanities, social science and engineering fields. The difference between the fits of the distributions is mostly small, however, and so either could reasonably be used for modelling citation data. For regression analyses, however, the best option is to use ordinary least squares regression applied to the natural logarithm of citation counts plus one, especially for sets of younger articles, because of the increased precision of the parameters.
Thelwall, M. (in press). The discretised lognormal and hooked power law distributions for complete citation data: Best options for modelling and regression. Journal of Informetrics
References in corpus (6)
- Power-law distributions in empirical data
- Universality of citation distributions: towards an objective measure of scientific impact
- Regression for citation data: An evaluation of different methods
- The precision of the arithmetic mean, geometric mean and percentiles for citation data: An experimental simulation modelling approach
- Distributions for cited articles from individual subjects and years
- National research impact indicators from Mendeley readers
Cited by in corpus (10)
- The citation advantage of linking publications to research data
- Could scientists use Altmetric.com scores to predict longer term citation counts?
- Three practical field normalised alternative indicator formulae for research evaluation
- On the relationships between bibliographic characteristics of scientific documents and citation and Mendeley readership counts: A large-scale analysis of Web of Science publications
- Science and Facebook: the same popularity law!
- Are there too many uncited articles? Zero inflated variants of the discretised lognormal and hooked power law distributions
- Power-law citation distributions are not scale-free
- Citation count distributions for large monodisciplinary journals
- Recency predicts bursts in the evolution of author citations
- Heavy-Tailed Distribution of the Number of Papers within Scientific Journals