Inequality and cumulative advantage in science careers: a case study of high-impact journals

Abstract

Analyzing a large data set of publications drawn from the most competitive journals in the natural and social sciences we show that research careers exhibit the broad distributions of individual achievement characteristic of systems in which cumulative advantage plays a key role. While most researchers are personally aware of the competition implicit in the publication process, little is known about the levels of inequality at the level of individual researchers. We analyzed both productivity and impact measures for a large set of researchers publishing in high-impact journals. For each researcher cohort we calculated Gini inequality coefficients, with average Gini values around 0.48 for total publications and 0.73 for total citations. For perspective, these observed values are well in excess of the inequality levels observed for personal income in developing countries. Investigating possible sources of this inequality, we identify two potential mechanisms that act at the level of the individual that may play defining roles in the emergence of the broad productivity and impact distributions found in science. First, we show that the average time interval between a researcher's successive publications in top journals decreases with each subsequent publication. Second, after controlling for the time dependent features of citation distributions, we compare the citation impact of subsequent publications within a researcher's publication record. We find that as researchers continue to publish in top journals, there is more likely to be a decreasing trend in the relative citation impact with each subsequent publication. This pattern highlights the difficulty of repeatedly publishing high-impact research and the intriguing possibility that confirmation bias plays a role in the evaluation of scientific careers.

2-page summary of the long published version which is available open access here at http://www.epjdatascience.com/content/3/1/24

References in corpus (9)

• Universality of citation distributions: towards an objective measure of scientific impact
• Diffusion of scientific credits and the ranking of scientists
• The Possible Role of Resource Requirements and Academic Career-Choice Risk on Gender Differences in Publication Rate and Impact
• Persistence and Uncertainty in the Academic Career
• Career on the Move: Geography, Stratification, and Scientific Impact
• A reverse engineering approach to the suppression of citation biases reveals universal properties of citation distributions
• A quantitative perspective on ethics in large team science
• The case for caution in predicting scientists' future impact
• Detrending career statistics in professional baseball: Accounting for the steroids era and beyond

Cited by in corpus (3)

• Investigating the contribution of author- and publication-specific features to scholars' h-index prediction
• Individual and gender inequality in computer science: A career study of cohorts from 1970 to 2000
• On the social and cognitive dimensions of wicked environmental problems characterized by conceptual and solution uncertainty