Accuracy of simple, initials-based methods for author name disambiguation

Abstract

There are a number of solutions that perform unsupervised name disambiguation based on the similarity of bibliographic records or common co-authorship patterns. Whether the use of these advanced methods, which are often difficult to implement, is warranted depends on whether the accuracy of the most basic disambiguation methods, which only use the author's last name and initials, is sufficient for a particular purpose. We derive realistic estimates for the accuracy of simple, initials-based methods using simulated bibliographic datasets in which the true identities of authors are known. Based on the simulations in five diverse disciplines we find that the first initial method already correctly identifies 97% of authors. An alternative simple method, which takes all initials into account, is typically two times less accurate, except in certain datasets that can be identified by applying a simple criterion. Finally, we introduce a new name-based method that combines the features of first initial and all initials methods by implicitly taking into account the last name frequency and the size of the dataset. This hybrid method reduces the fraction of incorrectly identified authors by 10-30% over the first initial method.

In press in Journal of Informetrics

References in corpus (3)

• A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments
• How are academic age, productivity and collaboration related to citing behavior of researchers?
• On the use of topological features and hierarchical characterization for disambiguating names in collaborative networks

Cited by in corpus (13)

• Distortive Effects of Initial-Based Name Disambiguation on Measurements of Large-Scale Coauthorship Networks
• Evaluating author name disambiguation for digital libraries: A case of DBLP
• Inequality and cumulative advantage in science careers: a case study of high-impact journals
• Topological-collaborative approach for disambiguating authors' names in collaborative networks
• ORCID-linked labeled data for evaluating author name disambiguation at scale
• Generating automatically labeled data for author name disambiguation: An iterative clustering method
• Feature analysis of multidisciplinary scientific collaboration patterns based on PNAS
• Distributed peer review enhanced with natural language processing and machine learning
• Effective Unsupervised Author Disambiguation with Relative Frequencies
• Motif-based success scores in coauthorship networks are highly sensitive to author name disambiguation
• Allometric Scaling in Scientific Fields
• On the social and cognitive dimensions of wicked environmental problems characterized by conceptual and solution uncertainty
• Associations between author-level metrics in subsequent time periods