Distortive Effects of Initial-Based Name Disambiguation on Measurements of Large-Scale Coauthorship Networks
arXiv:1502.06306 · doi:10.1002/asi.23489
Abstract
Scholars have often relied on name initials to resolve name ambiguities in large-scale coauthorship network research. This approach bears the risk of incorrectly merging or splitting author identities. The use of initial-based disambiguation has been justified by the assumption that such errors would not affect research findings too much. This paper tests this assumption by analyzing coauthorship networks from five academic fields - biology, computer science, nanoscience, neuroscience, and physics - and an interdisciplinary journal, PNAS. Name instances in datasets of this study were disambiguated based on heuristics gained from previous algorithmic disambiguation solutions. We use disambiguated data as a proxy of ground-truth to test the performance of three types of initial-based disambiguation. Our results show that initial-based disambiguation can misrepresent statistical properties of coauthorship networks: it deflates the number of unique authors, number of component, average shortest paths, clustering coefficient, and assortativity, while it inflates average productivity, density, average coauthor number per author, and largest component size. Also, on average, more than half of top 10 productive or collaborative authors drop off the lists. Asian names were found to account for the majority of misidentification by initial-based disambiguation due to their common surname and given name initials.
arXiv commentThis is a preprint of an article accepted for publication in Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
References in corpus (10)
- Assortative mixing in networks
- The structure of scientific collaboration networks
- Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations
- Diffusion of scientific credits and the ranking of scientists
- The Simultaneous Evolution of Author and Paper Networks
- Quantitative and empirical demonstration of the Matthew effect in a study of career longevity
- Career on the Move: Geography, Stratification, and Scientific Impact
- Coauthorship and citation in scientific publishing
- Modes of Collaboration in Modern Science - Beyond Power Laws and Preferential Attachment
- Accuracy of simple, initials-based methods for author name disambiguation
Cited by in corpus (16)
- The citation advantage of linking publications to research data
- Measuring and modelling correlations in multiplex networks
- Evaluating author name disambiguation for digital libraries: A case of DBLP
- The impact of imbalanced training data on machine learning for author name disambiguation
- Generating automatically labeled data for author name disambiguation: An iterative clustering method
- Feature analysis of multidisciplinary scientific collaboration patterns based on PNAS
- Modelling transition phenomena of scientific coauthorship networks
- A fast and integrative algorithm for clustering performance evaluation in author name disambiguation
- Effect of forename string on author name disambiguation
- Modeling the coevolution between citations and coauthorships in scientific papers
- Over-time measurement of triadic closure in coauthorship networks
- Convexity in scientific collaboration networks
- Scale-free collaboration networks: An author name disambiguation perspective
- Mask-GVAE: Blind Denoising Graphs via Partition
- Formational bounds of link prediction in collaboration networks
- Exploring cooperative game mechanisms of scientific coauthorship networks