Scale-free collaboration networks: An author name disambiguation perspective

Abstract

Several studies have found that collaboration networks are scale-free, proposing that such networks can be modeled by specific network evolution mechanisms like preferential attachment. This study argues that collaboration networks can look more or less scale-free depending on the methods for resolving author name ambiguity in bibliographic data. Analyzing networks constructed from multiple datasets containing 3.4M ~ 9.6M publication records, this study shows that collaboration networks in which author names are disambiguated by the commonly used heuristic, i.e., forename-initial-based name matching, tend to produce degree distributions better fitted to power-law slopes with the typical scaling parameter (2 < α < 3) than networks disambiguated by more accurate algorithm-based methods. Such tendency is observed across collaboration networks generated under various conditions such as cumulative years, 5- & 1-year sliding windows, and random sampling, and through simulation, found to arise due mainly to artefactual entities created by inaccurate disambiguation. This cautionary study calls for special attention from scholars analyzing network data in which entities such as people, organization, and gene can be merged or split by improper disambiguation.

22 pages, 12 figures, 5 tables

References in corpus (9)

• Power-law distributions in empirical data
• Scale-free networks are rare
• Modes of Collaboration in Modern Science - Beyond Power Laws and Preferential Attachment
• Distortive Effects of Initial-Based Name Disambiguation on Measurements of Large-Scale Coauthorship Networks
• Evaluating author name disambiguation for digital libraries: A case of DBLP
• On the use of topological features and hierarchical characterization for disambiguating names in collaborative networks
• Three-feature model to reproduce the topology of citation networks and the effects from authors' visibility on their h-index
• On time-varying collaboration networks
• PageRank for ranking authors in co-citation networks

Cited by in corpus (2)

• ORCID-linked labeled data for evaluating author name disambiguation at scale
• Asymmetry of social interactions and its role in link predictability: the case of coauthorship networks