On the use of topological features and hierarchical characterization for disambiguating names in collaborative networks
arXiv:1302.4504 · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/99/48002
Abstract
Many features of complex systems can now be unveiled by applying statistical physics methods to treat them as social networks. The power of the analysis may be limited, however, by the presence of ambiguity in names, e.g., caused by homonymy in collaborative networks. In this paper we show that the ability to distinguish between homonymous authors is enhanced when longer-distance connections are considered, rather than looking at only the immediate neighbors of a node in the collaborative network. Optimized results were obtained upon using the 3rd hierarchy in connections. Furthermore, reasonable distinction among authors could also be achieved upon using pattern recognition strategies for the data generated from the topology of the collaborative network. These results were obtained with a network from papers in the arXiv repository, into which homonymy was deliberately introduced to test the methods with a controlled, reliable dataset. In all cases, several methods of supervised and unsupervised machine learning were used, leading to the same overall results. The suitability of using deeper hierarchies and network topology was confirmed with a real database of movie actors, with the additional finding that the distinguishing ability can be further enhanced by combining topology features and long-range connections in the collaborative network.
References in corpus (2)
Cited by in corpus (7)
- Patterns of authors contribution in scientific manuscripts
- Using word embeddings to improve the discriminability of co-occurrence text networks
- On predicting research grants productivity
- Network-based stochastic competitive learning approach to disambiguation in collaborative networks
- Topological and Semantic Graph-based Author Disambiguation on DBLP Data in Neo4j
- Predicting the number of coauthors for researchers: A learning model
- Associations between author-level metrics in subsequent time periods